Prognostic evaluation of microRNA-210 in various carcinomas: Evidence from 19 studies.

Yincheng Liu,Yichun Wang,Qitong Xu,Xiang Zhou,Zhiqiang Qin,Chen Chen,Qijie Zhang,Ye Tian,Chao Zhang,Xiao Li,Chao Qin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008113
IF: 1.6
2017-01-01
Medicine
Abstract:Background:We performed this meta-analysis to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the role of MicroRNA-210 (miR-210) expression on the overall survival (OS) rate of cancers.Methods:We searched for relevant available literatures on miR-210 and cancer until November 1st, 2016 on the databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Science Direct database. We calculated the pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for OS, which compared the high and low expression levels of miR-210 in patients of the available studies. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the specific role of miR-210 in ethnicity and the type of cancers. Publication bias was evaluated using Begg funnel plots and Egger regression test.Results:Overall, 19 studies were involved in this meta-analysis. The result indicated that upregulated miR-210 might be associated with poor OS outcome in various carcinomas, with the pooled HR of 1.80 (95% CI: 1.29-2.51). When stratified by disease, significant results were detected in breast cancer (HR=2.67, 95% CI: 1.24-5.76) and glioma (HR=2.42, 95% CI: 1.32-4.43). Besides, in the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significant results were detected only in Asian populations (HR=2.14, 95% CI: 1.37-3.34).Conclusion:The present meta-analysis suggests that high expressed miR-210 is significantly associated with OS in cancer patients, which has the potential to be a prognostic marker in cancers.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?