Effects of Lumbosacral Orthoses on Postural Control in Individuals with or Without Non-Specific Low Back Pain

Jie Mi,Jiling Ye,Xin Zhao,Jie Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5355-5

IF: 2.721

2017-01-01

European Spine Journal

Abstract:To investigate the effect of lumbosacral orthoses (LSOs) on postural control in individuals with or without non-specific low back pain (NSLBP).

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Immediate Effect of Lumbosacral Orthosis and Abdominal Drawing-In Maneuver on Postural Control in Adults With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain

Fábio Carlos Lucas de Oliveira,Christian Larivière,Mathieu Dallaire,Hakim Mecheri,Suzy Ngomo,Rubens A da Silva

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.09.005

Abstract:Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the immediate effects of lumbosacral orthosis and the abdominal drawing-in maneuver on the trunk postural control of adults with chronic low back pain compared with asymptomatic controls during 1-legged and semi-tandem stances. Methods: An experimental and comparative study (cross-sectional design) was conducted in a laboratory setting. Twenty adults with chronic low back pain and 20 asymptomatic controls randomly performed 2 postural balance tasks over a force platform, considering 3 experimental conditions: (1) natural posture (baseline-control), (2) lumbosacral orthosis, and (3) abdominal drawing-in maneuver. Linear variables (mean amplitude, ellipse area, and sway velocity) derived from the center of pressure were computed, and 2-way analysis of variance (group × condition) for repeated measures were conducted. Results: No group × condition interactions (.139 ≤ P ≤.938) were detected in any center of pressure parameters. No condition effect was detected, but a group effect (P = .042) was observed for 1 center of pressure parameter. The chronic low back pain group presented with a lower mean anteroposterior center of pressure amplitude than asymptomatic controls (∆ = 0.31 ± 0.66 cm [95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.56], P = .019) during the semi-tandem stance balance task. Conclusion: Neither lumbosacral orthosis nor the abdominal drawing-in maneuver showed immediate improvement in trunk postural control in any group. Thus, clinicians should not expect immediate benefits or improvements yielded by lumbosacral orthosis or the abdominal drawing-in maneuver when patients with chronic low back pain undergo these interventions.
Effects of non-specific low back pain on static balance in emerging adults

Karen V. Lomond,Jennifer K. Sansom

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2364805

2024-06-12

Physiotherapy Theory and Practice

Abstract:Background Postural control impairments in middle-aged or older people with chronic low back pain (CLBP) have been extensively documented. However, little is known about changes in postural control early in the disease process which may underlie compensatory movement strategies.

rehabilitation
A Study on the Relationship between Postural Control and Pain-Related Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

Qiuhua Yu,Yunxia Huo,Min Chen,Zhou Zhang,Zhicheng Li,Haizhen Luo,Zhenwen Liang,Chuhuai Wang,Wai Leung Ambrose Lo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9054152

2021-11-02

Pain Research and Management

Abstract:Objectives. To explore the relationship between postural control and pain-related clinical outcomes in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain (cNLBP). Methods. Participants with cNLBP and healthy individuals were recruited. Muscle activities were recorded during internal and external perturbation tasks. Postural control capacity was assessed by muscle onset time and integrals of electromyography (iEMGs) of postural muscles during the phases of anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) and compensatory postural adjustments (CPAs). Correlation analysis was employed to investigate the relationship between postural control capacity, pain, and disability. Results. Twenty-seven patients with cNLBP and 27 healthy participants were recruited. Gastrocnemius (GA) muscle onset time was earlier in the cNLBP group than in the control group in the internal perturbation task. The onset time of GA and erector spinae (ES) of the cNLBP group was later than that of the controls in the external perturbation task. Disability level moderately correlated with the iEMGs of rectus abdominis (RA), GA, and external oblique (EO) during APAs. Pain score moderately correlated with the iEMGs of RA, EO, and ES during CPAs of perturbation tasks. Conclusion. cNLBP participants had altered muscle activation strategy to maintain postural stability in response to perturbation. This study further discovered that pain-related disabilities of cNLBP participants were likely related to the APAs capacity, whereas the pain intensity may relate to the CPAs capacity. Pain and disability may therefore be related to the control process of the posture-related muscles.

clinical neurology
The immediate effect of two lumbar stabilization methods on postural control parameters and their reliability during two balance tasks

Mohamed Abdelhafid Kadri,Marianne Violette,Mathieu Dallaire,Fábio Carlos Lucas de Oliveira,Martin Lavallière,Suzy Ngomo,Louis-David Beaulieu,Christian Larivière,Rubens A da Silva

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2020.1864961

Abstract:Background: Lumbosacral orthosis (LSO) and/or the isolated contraction of the transversus abdominis muscle by the abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) can increase lumbar stiffness, consequently influencing postural control. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of LSO and ADIM on postural control during two balance tasks and determine their reliability.Methods: Twenty participants (50% men) randomly performed three experimental conditions: 1) without lumbar stabilization, 2) with LSO), and 3) with ADIM. Each experimental condition was tested in two postural tasks: semi-tandem and one-legged stance on a force platform for 30 seconds, while the Center of pressure postural (COP) parameters were computed.Results: The two methods of lumbar stabilization were comparable and did not significantly reduce the COP values across time, even though a few individuals presented a change in their COP data above the levels of measurement errors. The reliability of these measurements was generally acceptable and sometimes excellent (≥ 0.90 and ≤10% error measurement).Conclusions: Both LSO and isolated contraction of the transversus abdominis muscle by ADIM do not change postural control in one-legged stance and in semi-tandem tasks. These results have implications for use or not these methods for postural control on a rehabilitation perspective.
Walking and running with non-specific chronic low back pain: What about the lumbar lordosis angle?

Edwige Simonet,Balz Winteler,Jana Frangi,Magdalena Suter,Michael L Meier,Patric Eichelberger,Heiner Baur,Stefan Schmid,Michael L. Meier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109883

IF: 2.4

2020-07-01

Journal of Biomechanics

Abstract:Non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) is a major health problem, affecting about one fifth of the population worldwide. To avoid further pain or injury, patients with NSCLBP seem to adopt a stiffer movement pattern during everyday living activities. However, it remains unknown how NSCLBP affects the lumbar lordosis angle (LLA) during repetitive activities such as walking or running. This pilot study therefore aimed at exploring possible NSCLBP-related alterations in LLAs during walking and running by focusing on discrete parameters as well as continuous data.Thirteen patients with NSCLBP and 20 healthy pain-free controls were enrolled and underwent a full-body movement analysis involving various everyday living activities such as standing, walking and running. LLAs were derived from markers placed on the spinous processes of the vertebrae L1-L5 and S1. Possible group differences in discrete (average and range of motion (ROM)) and continuous LLAs were analyzed descriptively using mean differences with confidence intervals ranging from 95% to 75%.Patients with NSCLBP indicated reduced average LLAs during standing, walking and running and a tendency for lower LLA-ROM during walking. Analyses of continuous data indicated the largest group differences occurring around 25% and 70% of the walking and 25% and 75% of the running cycle. Furthermore, patients indicated a reversed movement pattern during running, with increasing instead of a decreasing LLAs after foot strike.This study provides preliminary evidence that NSCLBP might affect LLAs during walking and running. These results can be used as a basis for future large-scale investigations involving hypothesis testing.

engineering, biomedical,biophysics
Can lumbosacral orthoses cause trunk muscle weakness? A systematic review of literature

Fatemeh Azadinia,Esmaeil Ebrahimi Takamjani,Mojtaba Kamyab,Mohamad Parnianpour,Jacek Cholewicki,Nader Maroufi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.12.005

Abstract:Background: Wearing lumbosacral orthosis (LSO) is one of the most common treatments prescribed for conservative management of low back pain. Although the results of randomized controlled trials suggest effectiveness of LSO in reducing pain and disability in these patients, there is a concern that prolonged use of LSO may lead to trunk muscle weakness and atrophy. Purpose: The present review aimed to evaluate available evidence in literature to determine whether LSO results in trunk muscle weakness or atrophy. Study design: This is a systematic review. Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Medline (via Ovid) followed by hand search of journals was performed. Prospective studies published in peer-reviewed journals, with full text available in English, investigating the effect of lumbar orthosis on trunk muscle activity, muscle thickness, strength or endurance, spinal force, and intra-abdominal pressure in healthy subjects or in patients with low back pain, were included. Methodological quality of selected studies was assessed by using the modified version of Downs and Black checklist. This research had no funding source, and the authors declare no conflicts of interest-associated biases. Results: Thirty-five studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The mean and standard deviation of the quality score was 64±9.7%. Most studies investigating the effect of lumbar orthosis on electromyographic activity (EMG) of trunk muscles demonstrated a decrease or no change in the EMG parameters. A few studies reported increased muscle activity. Lumbosacral orthosis was found to have no effect on muscle strength in some studies, whereas other studies demonstrated increased muscle strength. Only one study, which included ultrasound assessment of trunk muscle stabilizers, suggested reduced thickness of the abdominal muscles and reduced cross-sectional area of the multifidus muscles. Out of eight studies that investigated spinal compression load, the load was reduced in four studies and unchanged in three studies. One study showed that only elastic belts reduced compression force compared to leather and fabric belts and ascribed this reduction to the elastic property of the lumbar support. Conclusion: The present review showed that the changes in outcome measures associated with muscle work demands were inconsistent in their relation to the use of lumbar supports. This review did not find conclusive scientific evidence to suggest that orthosis results in trunk muscle weakness.
Effects of non-extensible lumbar belts on static and dynamic postural stability

Jingyuan Bai,Anke Hua,Dongkai Weng,Nan Wang,Jian Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06476-w

IF: 2.562

2023-01-01

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Abstract:Background Previous studies have found that increased intra-abdominal pressure helps to reduce spinal loading and improve spine stability. Non-extensible lumbar belts (NEBs) could elevate intra-abdominal pressure and augment spinal stability. NEBs have been used in the healthcare field to help reduce pain and improve spine function for people with low back pain. However, the effect of NEBs on static and dynamic postural stability is not clear. Methods This study aimed to investigate whether NEBs affect static and dynamic postural stability. Twenty-eight healthy male subjects were recruited to finish four static postural stability tasks and two dynamic postural stability tests. Center of pressure (COP) values during 30 s of quiet standing, dynamic postural stability index (DPSI) and Y balance test (YBT) score with and without NEBs were analyzed. Results NEBs had no significant effect in all COP variables in the static postural tasks. The results of a repeated measure two-way ANOVA indicated the NEBs significantly improved the dynamic postural stability in YBT score and DPSI (F (1,27) = 5.506, p = .027, η_p^2=.169 and F (1,27) = 83.94, p = .000, η_p^2=.757 respectively). Conclusions The study results indicate that non-extensible belts improve dynamic stability in healthy male participants, with potential implications for rehabilitation and performance enhancement programs.
Efficacy and Safety of Lateral Position Rotation and Pulling Manipulation for Treating Low Back Pain of Sacroiliac Joint Misalignment Origin: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Naiyan Wang,Guoqing Du,Yan Xue,Hongsheng Zhan,Ying Shi,Yongming Liu,Yuanyuan Feng,Xiang Wang,Zhijun Shen,Yizhe Xiong,Zhengyan Li,Mingcai Zhang,Qinjun Yu,Qunying Han,Yupeng Wang,Yulong Lian,Kaiyong Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3158322/v1

2023-01-01

Abstract:Abstract Background: Clinical studies have confirmed that traditional lumbar oblique-pulling manipulation (TLOM) can effectively improve lumbosacral pain caused by sacroiliac joint misalignment. However, the absence of established standards and norms for TLOM, combined with its diverse approaches, increases the likelihood of deviations in clinical effectiveness and potential exacerbation of the ailment. Methods: we will use a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate and show that the lateral position rotation and pulling manipulation (LPRPM) is safer and more effective than the TLOM in the treatment of low back pain of sacroiliac joint misalignment origin. In this study, we propose to evaluate the effectiveness of LPRPM in the treatment of low back pain of sacroiliac joint misalignment origin by assessing the rate of improvement in pain symptoms, lumbar spine mobility, lumbar pain visual analogue scale (VAS), lumbar spine dysfunction Oswestry disability index(ODI), lumbar spine symptom improvement Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores (JOA), and overall functional improvement Short Form 36(SF-36). We will recruit 272 patients diagnosed with low back pain of sacroiliac joint misalignment origin and randomly assign them to the trial and control groups in a 1:1 ratio. The trial group (n = 136) will be treated with LPRPM, and the control group (n = 136) will be treated with TLOM. Outcomes will be measured at four time points: before the first treatment, immediately after the first treatment, 1 week after the first treatment, and 1 month after the first treatment. Adverse events will be recorded. Discussion: In this research, we have modified TLOM and introduced a new technique called LPRPM to verify whether this manipulation is efficacy and safety.
Effects of 12-week lumbar stabilization exercise and sling exercise on lumbosacral region angle, lumbar muscle strength, and pain scale of patients with chronic low back pain

Kwang-Jun Ko,Gi-Chul Ha,Young-Sook Yook,Seol-Jung Kang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.18

2018-01-01

Journal of Physical Therapy Science

Abstract:[Purpose] The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of lumbar stabilization exercise and sling exercise on lumbosacral region angle, lumbar muscle strength, pain scale of patients with chronic low back pain. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects of this study were 29 chronic low back pain patient women who were selected among participants in exercise class at K Region Health Promotion Center in South Korea and were randomly assigned to the lumbar stabilization exercise group (n=10), sling exercise group (n=10), and the control group (n=9). Both lumbar stabilization and sling exercise programs were executed for 60 minutes, three times a week, for 12 weeks. Before and after exercise we measured lumbosacral region angle (lumbar lordosis angle, lumbosacral angle, sacral inclination angle), lumbar muscle strength, and pain scale in all subjects. Two-way analysis of variance was conducted to analyze experimental data. In order to analyze the interaction effect, we conducted paired t-test before and after treatment. [Results] Lumbar stabilization exercise group and sling exercises group did not affect lumbar lordosis angle, lumbosacral angle and sacral inclination angle. Whereas the lumbar flexion muscle strength and lumbar extension muscle strength significantly increased in the lumbar stabilization exercise group and sling exercise group. The flexibility increased in the lumbar stabilization exercise group and sling exercise group. The pain scale decreased in the lumbar stabilization exercise group and sling exercise group. [Conclusion] Both lumbar stabilization exercise and sling exercises are useful therapeutic approaches to chronic back pain.
Analysis of lumbar spine loading during walking in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy controls: An OpenSim-Based study

Zhuodong Zhang,Jihua Zou,Pengcheng Lu,Jinjing Hu,Yuxin Cai,Chongwu Xiao,Gege Li,Qing Zeng,Manxu Zheng,GuoZhi Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1377767

IF: 5.7

2024-05-14

Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Abstract:Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most prevalent and disabling disease worldwide. However, the specific biomechanical changes due to LBP are still controversial. The purpose of this study was to estimate the lumbar and lower limb kinematics, lumbar moments and loads, muscle forces and activation during walking in healthy adults and LBP. A total of 18 healthy controls and 19 patients with chronic LBP were tested for walking at a comfortable speed. The kinematic and dynamic data of the subjects were collected by 3D motion capture system and force plates respectively, and then the motion simulation was performed by OpenSim. The OpenSim musculoskeletal model was used to calculate lumbar, hip, knee and ankle joint angle variations, lumbar moments and loads, muscle forces and activation of eight major lumbar muscles. In our results, significant lower lumbar axial rotation angle, lumbar flexion/extension and axial rotation moments, as well as the muscle forces of the four muscles and muscle activation of two muscles were found in patients with LBP than those of the healthy controls ( p < 0.05). This study may help providing theoretical support for the evaluation and rehabilitation treatment intervention of patients with LBP.

multidisciplinary sciences
Kinematic changes of the trunk and lower limbs during voluntary lateral sway postural control in adults with low back pain

Zhengquan Chen,Oren Tirosh,Jia Han,Roger Adams,Doa El-Ansary,Adrian Pranata

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1351913

IF: 5.7

2024-02-28

Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Abstract:Introduction: Voluntary lateral weight shifting is essential for gait initiation. However, kinematic changes during voluntary lateral weight shifting remain unknown in people with low back pain (LBP). This study aims to explore the differences in kinematics and muscle activation when performing a voluntary lateral weight shifting task between patients with LBP and asymptomatic controls without pain. Methods: Twenty-eight participants volunteered in this study (14 in both the LBP group and the control group). The Sway Discrimination Apparatus (SwayDA) was used to generate a postural sway control task, mimicking lateral weight shifting movements when initiating gait. Kinematic parameters, including range of motion (ROM) and standard deviation of ROM (Std-ROM) of the lumbar spine, pelvis, and lower limb joints, were recorded using a motion capture system during lateral weight shifting. The electroactivity of the trunk and lower limb muscles was measured through surface electromyography using root mean square (RMS). The significant level was 0.05. An independent t -test was employed to compare kinematic parameters, and muscle activation between the LBP group and the control group. A paired-sample t -test, adjusted with Bonferroni correction (significant level of 0.025), was utilized to examine differences between the ipsilateral weight shifting towards side (dominant side) and the contralateral side. Results: The results of kinematic parameters showed significantly decreased ROM and std-ROM of the ipsilateral hip in the transverse plane (t ROM = −2.059, p = 0.050; t std-ROM = −2.670, p = 0.013), as well as decreased ROM of the ipsilateral knee in the coronal plane ( t = −2.148, p = 0.042), in the LBP group compared to the control group. For the asymptomatic controls, significantly larger ROM and ROM-std were observed in the hip and knee joints on the ipsilateral side in contrast to the contralateral side (3.287 ≤ t ≤ 4.500, 0.001 ≤ p ≤ 0.006), but no significant differences were found between the two sides in the LBP group. In addition, the LBP group showed significantly lower RMS of the biceps femoris than the control group (t RMS = −2.186, p = 0.044). Discussion: Patients with LBP showed a conservative postural control pattern, characterized by reduced ROM of ipsilateral joints and diminished activation of the biceps femoris. These findings suggested the importance of voluntary postural control assessment and intervention to maximize recovery.

multidisciplinary sciences
Comparison of Postural Control Between Healthy Subjects and Individuals with Nonspecific Low Back Pain During Exposure to Visual Stimulus.

Li Rui,Wang Ninghua,Yan Xiang,Wei Kunlin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20121430

IF: 6.133

2014-01-01

Chinese Medical Journal

Abstract:Background Low back pain (LBP) is a common clinical problem. Many researchers have demonstrated that LBP disorders have difference in sensory strategies for postural control. Optokinetic stimulation (OKS) of optic flow has been widely applied to study its effect on vision, but has not been applied to LBP. Here we used OKS on different surfaces to investigate the characteristics of chronic nonspecific LBP (CNLBP) posture control, so as to provide new theoretical and experimental data for further recognizing CNLBP and enriching its treatment. Methods Fifteen individuals with CNLBP (age range 25–40 years) and 15 age and gender-matched control subjects were recruited. Each subject, while standing on a stable or soft surface, was exposed to random-dot patterns projected on a large screen, with the dots displaying expansion (+) and contraction (-) and velocities including 80°, 40°, and 20° per second. The visual stimulus used a “stimuli-interval” pattern. The peak velocity, different phases’ standard deviation (SD) of the anterior-posterior centre of pressure (COP) displacements and the total length of the medial-lateral COP sway (LML) for stable surface and soft surface were recorded by force platform. Results The main effect of surface on all parameters was significant, while the main effect of group and OKS showed no significance with the exception of peak velocity (F(3,95)=3.6, P=0.01) and A2 (F(5,140)=9.34, P <0.01) for which the effect of OKS was significant. The interactions of group by OKS of A2 (F(5,140)=3.65, P <0.01) and group by surface by OKS (F(5,140)=2.83, P=0.02), and surface by OKS of A1 and A3 (P <0.05) were significant. It was reported that significantly more SD in amplitude in the T2 phase was seen in persons with CNLBP when confronting the + 40 stimuli on the soft surface (P <0.05) compared to healthy individuals. Conclusions There was no significance between persons with CNLBP and healthy people when using the stable surface. Subjects with LBP showed decreased efficiency of postural adjustment when exposed to more complicated tasks and environments, especially OKS in the expansion direction, and displayed a visual-dependent phenomenon. This result suggested that the treatment of abnormal motor patterns in people with LBP should take the properties of task and environment into account.
The associations between lumbar proprioception and postural control during and after calf vibration in people with and without chronic low back pain

Zengming Hao,Xue Cheng,Haimei Jiang,Jiajia Yang,Yan Li,Wai Leung Ambrose Lo,Qiuhua Yu,Chuhuai Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1329437

IF: 5.7

2024-03-20

Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Abstract:The relationships of lumbar proprioception with postural control have not been clarified in people with chronic low back pain. This study aimed to compare the associations between lumbar proprioception and postural control in response to calf vibration in individuals with and without chronic low back pain. In this study, we recruited twenty patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP group) and twenty healthy control subjects (HC group) aged between 18 and 50 years. This study was a cross-sectional study and completed from May 2022 to October 2022. The passive joint repositioning sense (PJRS) test for two positions (15° and 35°) were used to assess lumbar proprioception and expressed as the mean of reposition error (RE). Postural control was tested by adding and removing calf vibration while standing on a stable force plate with eyes closed. The sway velocity in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction of center of pressure (COP) data with a window of 15s epoch at baseline, during and after calf vibration was used to evaluate postural control. Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to compare the difference of lumbar proprioception between two groups, and the independent t-tests were used to compare the difference of postural control at baseline and during vibration, and a mixed design ANOVA was used to compare the difference of postural control during post-perturbation. In addition, to explore the association between postural control and lumbar proprioception and pain intensity, Spearman's correlations were used for each group. The major results are: (1) significantly higher PJRS on RE of 15° (CLBP: 95% CI [2.03, 3.70]; HC: 95% CI [1.03, 1.93]) and PJRS on RE of 35° (CLBP: 95% CI [2.59, 4.88]; HC: 95% CI [1.07, 3.00]) were found in the CLBP group; (2) AP velocity was not different between the CLBP group and the HC group at baseline and during calf vibration. However, AP velocity was significantly larger in the CLBP group compared with the HC group at epoch 2–14 after calf vibration, and AP velocity for the CLBP group took a longer time (23 epochs) to return to the baseline after calf vibration compared with the HC group (9 epochs); (3) lumbar proprioception represented by PJRS on RE of 15°correlated negatively with AP velocity during and after vibration for the HC group. Within the CLBP group, no significant relationships between PJRS on RE for two positions (15° and 35°) and AP velocity in any postural phases were found. In conclusion, the CLBP group has poorer lumbar proprioception, slower proprioceptive reweighting and impaired postural control after calf vibration compared to the HC group. Lumbar proprioception offers different information on the control strategy of standing control for individuals with and without CLBP in the situations with proprioceptive disturbance. These results highlight the significance of assessing lumbar proprioception and postural control in CLBP patients.

multidisciplinary sciences
Leg Length Discrepancy and Nonspecific Low Back Pain: 3-D Stereophotogrammetric Quantitative Posture Evaluation Confirms Positive Effects of Customized Heel-Lift Orthotics

Moreno D’Amico,Edyta Kinel,Piero Roncoletta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.743132

IF: 5.7

2022-02-10

Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Abstract:Background: The literature reports evidence of leg length discrepancy (LLD) associated with musculoskeletal disorders, alterations in spinopelvic alignment, and body posture, leading to low back pain and lumbar scoliosis. The most common conservative treatment for LLD is the use of internal or external shoe lifts although no treatment guidelines have been established. Aim: The study aimed to contribute to low back pain–LLD relationship comprehension, highlighting the benefits of LLD correction in the nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) population. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study recruited a cohort of 80 NSLBP patients (48 females, 32 males) with LLD, age ( μ = 35 ± 17.2). Entire body posture, including 3-D spine shape reconstruction, was measured using a nonionizing 3-D optoelectronic stereophotogrammetric approach. After the first 3-D posture evaluation, patients were provided with customized orthotics, including 100% LLD heel lift correction. No other therapeutic interventions were considered. Pain level was assessed using the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS). The gender, age-related, and time-dependent effects of LLD equalization treatment in NSLBP patients was investigated during 2 years of follow-up. The statistical analysis was performed at the global level using multivariate methods by Hotelling T 2 tests and intrasubject-level using t -test. Results and Discussion: An initial average NPRS = 7.8 was determined. In the medium-term follow-up group (4 months), the NPRS dramatically decreased (NPRS = 1.1). The pain disappeared in the long-term (2 years) follow-up group (NPRS = 0). The study results highlight that LLD equalization treatment led to clear statistically significant improvements in all the postural parameters of the frontal plane, including the underfoot load asymmetry. No worsening has been detected. An adaptation period long enough is needed to obtain progressive pain relief improvements and structural posture changes. Younger NSLBP patients showed slightly better improvements than older ones. Minimal differences between healthy young adults’ and NSLBP patients’ postures were found either in natural erect standing posture or when LLD equalization is applied. Conclusion: Heel-lift customized orthotics with 100% LLD correction are an effective short- and long-term treatment in patients with nonspecific LBP, inducing pain symptom recession and stimulating the improvement of postural parameters without contraindications.

multidisciplinary sciences
Are changes in pain intensity related to changes in balance control in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Daniel K Y Zheng,Jae Q J Liu,Jeremy R Chang,Jeffrey C Y Ng,Zhixing Zhou,Jinlong Wu,Chelsia K C Cheung,Frank F Huang,Sabina M Pinto,Dino Samartzis,Manuela L Ferreira,Kanchana Ekanayake,Stephen Lord,Xueqiang Wang,Arnold Y L Wong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2024.100989

2024-09-17

Abstract:Purpose: The aim of this study is to summarize the evidence regarding whether pain reduction in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) following conservative interventions is related to corresponding improvements in balance control. Methods: Randomized controlled trials were identified from 5 databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO). Two reviewers independently screened and identified relevant studies that investigated the effects of nonsurgical or nonpharmacological CNSLBP treatments on both pain intensity and balance control. Meta-regression analyses were performed to establish the associations between post-treatment changes in these 2 variables. Results: 31 studies involving 1280 participants with CNSLBP were included. Moderate-quality evidence suggested that pain reduction was associated with and explained 34-45 % of decreases in body sway, as measured by center-of-pressure (CoP) area and CoP velocity with eyes open. However, no significant association was observed between pain reduction and CoP area or velocity in anteroposterior/mediolateral directions. Similarly, there was no significant association between pain reduction and CoP distance or radius. Low-quality evidence indicated that pain relief explained a 15 % improvement in one-leg stance with eyes open but not in the eyes-closed condition. Additionally, very low-quality evidence suggested that pain relief explained a 44 % decrease in the static anteroposterior stability index with eyes closed but not in the eyes-open, mediolateral, or overall conditions. Furthermore, low-quality evidence indicated that reduced pain was associated with and accounted for 25-43 % of the improved composite and posteromedial scores of the star-excursion balance test, rather than the anterior and posterolateral scores. Conclusion: Depending on the type of balance assessment, pain relief following conservative interventions may slightly to moderately enhance balance control in individuals with CNSLBP. Clinicians should pay close attention to the balance control in patients with CNSLBP, particularly among older adults.
3D Stereophotogrammetric Quantitative Evaluation of Posture and Spine Proprioception in Subacute and Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

Edyta Kinel,Piero Roncoletta,Tiziana Pietrangelo,Moreno D’Amico

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030546

IF: 3.9

2022-01-22

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract:The literature shows that low back pain causes a reduced lumbar range of movement, affecting patients’ proprioception and motor control. Nevertheless, studies have found that proprioception and motor control of the spine and posture are vague and individually expressed even in healthy young adults. This study aimed to investigate the standing posture and its modifications induced by an instinctive self-correction manoeuvre in subacute and chronic nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) patients to clarify how NSLBP relates to body upright posture, proprioception, and motor control and how these are modified in patients compared to healthy young adults (121 healthy young adults: 57 females and 64 males). A cohort of 83 NSLBP patients (43 females, 40 males) were recruited in a cross-sectional observational study. Patients’ entire body posture, including 3D spine shape reconstruction, was measured using a non-ionising 3D optoelectronic stereophotogrammetric approach. Thirteen quantitative biomechanical parameters describing the nature of body posture were computed. The statistical analysis was performed using multivariate methods. NSLBP patients did not present an altered proprioception and motor control ability compared to healthy young adults. Furthermore, as for healthy subjects, NSLBP patients could not focus and control their posture globally. Proprioception and motor control in natural erect standing are vague for most people regardless of gender and concurrent nonspecific low back pain. Self-correction manoeuvres improving body posture and spine shape must be learned with specific postural training focusing on the lumbar spine.

medicine, general & internal
The effect of chronic low back pain and lumbopelvic stabilization instructions on gluteus medius activation during sidelying hip movements

Myra M. Meekins,Audrey Zucker-Levin,Marcie Harris-Hayes,Kunal Singhal,Kyle Huffman,Richard Kasser

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2357130

2024-05-29

Physiotherapy Theory and Practice

Abstract:Background People with chronic low back pain (LBP) often demonstrate altered muscle activation with movements that involve the lumbopelvic region and hips.

rehabilitation
The Effect of the Neurac Sling Exercise on Postural Balance Adjustment and Muscular Response Patterns in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients

Ji Hae Kim,Young Eok Kim,Sea Hyun Bae,Kyung Yoon Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.25.1015

2013-01-01

Journal of Physical Therapy Science

Abstract:[Purpose] This study aimed to examine the effects of the Neurac sling exercise on postural balance adjustment and muscular response patterns in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. [Subjects and Methods] Sixteen CLBP patients participated in this study. They were randomly and equally assigned to group I, whose members received ordinary physical therapy (40 minutes per time, four times per week), and group II, whose members performed a lumbar stabilization exercise using the Neurac sling after ordinary physical therapy (40 minutes per time, four times per week). The visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to evaluate exercise effects. BioRescue and electromyography were utilized for the measurement of changes in postural balance adjustment and muscular response patterns, respectively. [Results] Both groups saw their VAS and ODI decrease significantly. There were significant decreases in both groups in posturography as well, but group II recorded a greater decrease. There were significant increases in the flexion-relaxation ratio in both groups, and there were significant increases in the extension-flexion ratio in the left L1-2 of group I and in all elements of group II. [Conclusion] Lumbar stabilization exercise using the Neurac sling is effective in decreasing pain, improving damaged postural balance adjustment, and normalizing muscle response patterns of CLBP patients.
Network meta-analysis on the effects of various exercise modalities on pain control in populations with chronic nonspecific low back pain

ke zhao,Hua Li,Li Li,Yongxiao li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.07.24316901

2024-11-10

Abstract:Objective:This study aims to comprehensively evaluate and compare the effects of various exercise modalities on the control of chronic nonspecific low back pain through a network meta-analysis, in order to identify the most effective interventions. Methods: Adhering strictly to the PRISMA guidelines, this study selected randomized controlled trials from databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus, up to June 30, 2024. Data were processed using Stata 17.0 software, and the effect sizes were synthesized using standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The SUCRA method was used to rank the effectiveness of the interventions. Results: A total of 26 studies involving 1,507 participants aged between 20 and 63.5 years were included. The network meta-analysis revealed that yoga [SMD = -1.71 (-2.93, -0.49), P < 0.05] and core stability training [SMD = -0.81 (-1.44, -0.18), P < 0.05] were significantly more effective than the control group. SUCRA probability ranking indicated that Tai Chi (SUCRA = 77.4) might be the best modality for improving control of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Conclusion: This network meta-analysis demonstrates the intervention effects of different exercise modalities on chronic nonspecific low back pain, with Tai Chi potentially being the most effective intervention. This provides an important reference for non-pharmacological interventions in chronic nonspecific low back pain.

Sports Medicine

Effects of Lumbosacral Orthoses on Postural Control in Individuals with or Without Non-Specific Low Back Pain

Immediate Effect of Lumbosacral Orthosis and Abdominal Drawing-In Maneuver on Postural Control in Adults With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain

Effects of non-specific low back pain on static balance in emerging adults

A Study on the Relationship between Postural Control and Pain-Related Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

The immediate effect of two lumbar stabilization methods on postural control parameters and their reliability during two balance tasks

Walking and running with non-specific chronic low back pain: What about the lumbar lordosis angle?

Can lumbosacral orthoses cause trunk muscle weakness? A systematic review of literature

Effects of non-extensible lumbar belts on static and dynamic postural stability

Efficacy and Safety of Lateral Position Rotation and Pulling Manipulation for Treating Low Back Pain of Sacroiliac Joint Misalignment Origin: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of 12-week lumbar stabilization exercise and sling exercise on lumbosacral region angle, lumbar muscle strength, and pain scale of patients with chronic low back pain

Analysis of lumbar spine loading during walking in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy controls: An OpenSim-Based study

Kinematic changes of the trunk and lower limbs during voluntary lateral sway postural control in adults with low back pain

Comparison of Postural Control Between Healthy Subjects and Individuals with Nonspecific Low Back Pain During Exposure to Visual Stimulus.

The associations between lumbar proprioception and postural control during and after calf vibration in people with and without chronic low back pain

Leg Length Discrepancy and Nonspecific Low Back Pain: 3-D Stereophotogrammetric Quantitative Posture Evaluation Confirms Positive Effects of Customized Heel-Lift Orthotics

Are changes in pain intensity related to changes in balance control in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis

3D Stereophotogrammetric Quantitative Evaluation of Posture and Spine Proprioception in Subacute and Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

The effect of chronic low back pain and lumbopelvic stabilization instructions on gluteus medius activation during sidelying hip movements

The Effect of the Neurac Sling Exercise on Postural Balance Adjustment and Muscular Response Patterns in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients

Network meta-analysis on the effects of various exercise modalities on pain control in populations with chronic nonspecific low back pain