Liqun Peng,Yang Guo,Shangwei Liu,Gang He,Denise L Mauzerall,Denise L. Mauzerall
Abstract:Clean hydrogen has the potential to serve as an energy carrier and feedstock in decarbonizing energy systems, especially in "hard-to-abate" sectors. Although many countries have implemented policies to promote electrolytic hydrogen development, the impact of these measures on costs of production and greenhouse gas emissions remains unclear. Our study conducts an integrated analysis of provincial levelized costs and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for all hydrogen production types in China....
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve
This paper aims to explore the impact of subsidizing grid-based electrolytic hydrogen on costs and greenhouse gas emissions in the context of China's coal-dominated power system. Specifically, the study focuses on the following aspects:
1. **Cost Analysis**: Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different hydrogen production methods (including coal-based, natural gas-based, grid-based, and renewable-based) through a provincial-level Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH2) analysis.
2. **Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions**: Quantify the greenhouse gas emissions over the entire lifecycle of different hydrogen production methods through a Lifecycle Assessment (LCA).
3. **Policy Impact**: Analyze the impact of different subsidy strategies on the cost and greenhouse gas emissions of electrolytic hydrogen development, particularly the trade-offs between subsidizing grid-based electrolytic hydrogen and renewable-based electrolytic hydrogen.
### Main Findings
1. **Most Cost-Effective Hydrogen Production Methods**:
- In 2025, grid-based electrolytic hydrogen is the most cost-effective option in most provinces.
- From 2030 onwards, wind-based electrolytic hydrogen becomes the most cost-effective option in most coastal provinces.
- Solar-based electrolytic hydrogen remains the most cost-effective option in some provinces (such as Beijing, Tianjin, Gansu, Shanxi, Yunnan) and becomes the cheapest option in 13 provinces by 2040.
2. **Greenhouse Gas Emissions**:
- Although coal-based hydrogen has the lowest levelized cost, it has the highest lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions.
- Grid-based electrolytic hydrogen has higher greenhouse gas emissions in 2025, but these emissions will significantly decrease by 2050 as the power system decarbonizes.
- Renewable-based electrolytic hydrogen has the lowest greenhouse gas emissions, and these emissions will further decrease with advancements in renewable energy technology.
3. **Impact of Subsidy Strategies**:
- Subsidizing grid-based electrolytic hydrogen in provinces heavily reliant on coal power (such as Xinjiang, Western and Eastern Inner Mongolia, Ningxia) will increase lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions due to higher energy losses in converting coal to electricity and then to hydrogen.
- Limiting subsidies to renewable-based electrolytic hydrogen will significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
- Subsidizing renewable-based electrolytic hydrogen production in provinces rich in renewable resources is an effective emission reduction mechanism.
4. **Impact of Hydrogen Pipeline Network**:
- As hydrogen demand increases, inter-provincial transportation will become necessary. Pipelines are the most economical transportation method for distances of 200-1500 kilometers.
- Transporting electrolytic hydrogen from regions like Western Inner Mongolia, Hebei, and Fujian can reduce the national average levelized cost but may increase greenhouse gas emissions due to leakage during long-distance transportation.
- To minimize carbon emissions, priority should be given to transporting renewable-based electrolytic hydrogen.
### Policy Recommendations
1. **Subsidy Strategy**: Prioritize subsidies for renewable-based electrolytic hydrogen to avoid increasing greenhouse gas emissions from grid-based electrolytic hydrogen.
2. **Infrastructure Development**: Carefully consider the risk of hydrogen leakage when developing hydrogen pipeline networks, prioritizing the transportation of renewable-based electrolytic hydrogen.
3. **Technology R&D**: Continue to support research and development of renewable energy technologies and electrolytic hydrogen production technologies to reduce costs and improve efficiency.
Through these analyses, the paper emphasizes the importance of policy and economic support in promoting the development of the hydrogen industry, particularly in ensuring a low-carbon transition while avoiding increased greenhouse gas emissions.