Abstract:Tensor-based robust principal component analysis (PCA) methods are efficient to discover the low-rank part of a hyperspectral image for reducing redundant information and guarantee good classification results. However, current methods cannot remove noise adequately, and the residual noise remaining in the low-rank image limits the further improvement of classification performance. Thus, enhancing the robustness to noise is important and helpful for tensor-based robust PCA (RPCA) methods to process hyperspectral images. To this end, we propose a tensor-based RPCA method with a locality preserving graph and frontal slice sparsity (LPGTRPCA) for hyperspectral image classification. Specifically, a tensor <span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="4.306ex" height="2.843ex" style="vertical-align: -1.005ex;" viewBox="0 -791.3 1854.1 1223.9" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-6C" x="0" y="0"></use><g transform="translate(298,-150)"> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMAIN-32" x="0" y="0"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMAIN-2C" x="500" y="0"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMAIN-32" x="779" y="0"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMAIN-2C" x="1279" y="0"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMAIN-31" x="1558" y="0"></use></g></g></svg></span> norm that requires the frontal slice sparsity of a tensor is defined to extract the noise in the hyperspectral image from the frontal direction. What is more, a position-based Laplacian graph that preserves the local structures of a tensor according to the spatial position is designed for relieving the impact of the residual noise remaining in the low-rank image. Based on the tensor nuclear norm, the tensor <span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="4.306ex" height="2.843ex" style="vertical-align: -1.005ex;" viewBox="0 -791.3 1854.1 1223.9" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-6C" x="0" y="0"></use><g transform="translate(298,-150)"> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMAIN-32" x="0" y="0"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMAIN-2C" x="500" y="0"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMAIN-32" x="779" y="0"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMAIN-2C" x="1279" y="0"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMAIN-31" x="1558" y="0"></use></g></g></svg></span> norm, and the position-based Laplacian graph, LPGTRPCA efficiently separates the low-rank part with little noise from a raw hyperspectral image and achieves more robust classification results than current methods. LPGTRPCA is optimized by the alternative direction multiplier method (ADMM), and the convergence of solutions is experimentally demonstrated. In the experiments conducted on Indian Pines, Pavia University, and Salinas datasets, LPGTRPCA outperformed various state-of-the-art and classical tensor-based RPCA methods in terms of average class classification accuracy (AA), overall classification accuracy (OA), and kappa coefficient (KC).<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="display: none;"><defs id="MathJax_SVG_glyphs"><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMATHI-6C" d="M117 59Q117 26 142 26Q179 26 205 131Q211 151 215 152Q217 153 225 153H229Q238 153 241 153T246 151T248 144Q247 138 245 128T234 90T214 43T183 6T137 -11Q101 -11 70 11T38 85Q38 97 39 102L104 360Q167 615 167 623Q167 626 166 628T162 632T157 634T149 635T141 636T132 637T122 637Q112 637 109 637T101 638T95 641T94 647Q94 649 96 661Q101 680 107 682T179 688Q194 689 213 690T243 693T254 694Q266 694 266 686Q266 675 193 386T118 83Q118 81 118 75T117 65V59Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMAIN-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMAIN-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMAIN-31" d="M213 578L200 573Q186 568 160 563T102 556H83V602H102Q149 604 189 617T245 641T273 663Q275 666 285 666Q294 666 302 660V361L303 61Q310 54 315 52T339 48T401 46H427V0H416Q395 3 257 3Q121 3 100 0H88V46H114Q136 46 152 46T177 47T193 50T201 52T207 57T213 61V578Z"></path></defs></svg>

Graph-regularized Tensor Robust Principal Component Analysis for Hyperspectral Image Denoising.

Adaptive Regularized Low-Rank Tensor Decomposition for Hyperspectral Image Denoising and Destriping

Hyperspectral Restoration Via $L_0$ Gradient Regularized Low-Rank Tensor Factorization

Group Sparse Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Hyperspectral Image Denoising

Hyperspectral Image Denoising with Partially Orthogonal Matrix Vector Tensor Factorization

Hyperspectral Imagery Denoising Via Reweighed Sparse Low-Rank Nonnegative Tensor Factorization

Hyperspectral Image Denoising Using Nonconvex Local Low-Rank and Sparse Separation With Spatial–Spectral Total Variation Regularization

L0 Gradient Regularized Low-Rank Tensor Model for Hyperspectral Image Denoising.

Enhanced Tensor Low-Rank Representation Learning for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection

Multitask Sparse Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Joint Spectral–Spatial Hyperspectral Imagery Denoising

Hyperspectral Image Denoising with Log-Based Robust PCA

Multitask Sparse Representation Model-Inspired Network for Hyperspectral Image Denoising

Mixed Poisson-Gaussian Noise Model Based Sparse Denoising for Hyperspectral Imagery.

Deep Parameterized Neural Networks for Hyperspectral Image Denoising

Hyperspectral Image Denoising via Tensor Low-Rank Prior and Unsupervised Deep Spatial–Spectral Prior

Unidirectional Spatial and Spectral Smoothed Tensor Ring Decomposition for Hyperspectral Image Denoising and Destriping

Hyperspectral Image Denoising via Framelet Transformation Based Three-Modal Tensor Nuclear Norm

NL3DLogTNN: An Effective Hyperspectral Image Denoising Method Combined Non-Local Self-Similarity and Low-Fibered- Rank Regularization

Hyperspectral Image Mixed Noise Removal via Double Factor Total Variation Nonlocal Low-Rank Tensor Regularization

Tensor-Based Robust Principal Component Analysis With Locality Preserving Graph and Frontal Slice Sparsity for Hyperspectral Image Classification