Abstract:Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing, resembling A-to-G mutation, confers adaptiveness by increasing proteomic diversity in a temporal-spatial manner. This evolutionary theory named "proteomic diversifying hypothesis" has only partially been tested in very few organisms like Drosophila melanogaster , mainly by observing the positive selection on nonsynonymous editing events. To find additional genome-wide evidences supporting this interesting assumption, we retrieved the genomes of four Drosophila species and collected 20 deep-sequenced transcriptomes of different developmental stages and neuron populations of D. melanogaster . We systematically profiled the RNA editomes in these samples and performed meticulous comparative genomic analyses. Further evidences were found to support the diversifying hypothesis. (1) None of the nonsynonymous editing sites in D. melanogaster had ancestral G-alleles, while the silent editing sites had an unignorable fraction of ancestral G-alleles; (2) Only very few nonsynonymous editing sites in D. melanogaster had corresponding G-alleles derived in the genomes of sibling species, and the fraction of such situation was significantly lower than that of silent editing sites; (3) The few nonsynonymous editing with corresponding G-alleles had significantly more variable editing levels (across samples) than other nonsynonymous editing sites in D. melanogaster . The proteomic diversifying nature of RNA editing in Drosophila excludes the restorative role which favors an ancestral G-allele. The few fixed G-alleles in sibling species might facilitate the adaptation to particular environment and the corresponding nonsynonymous editing in D. melanogaster would introduce stronger advantage of flexible proteomic diversification. With multi-Omics data, our study consolidates the nature of evolutionary significance of A-to-I RNA editing sites in model insects.

Linkage of A-to-I RNA Editing in Metazoans and the Impact on Genome Evolution.

A-To-I Rna Editing Alters Less-Conserved Residues of Highly Conserved Coding Regions: Implications for Dual Functions in Evolution

Evolutionary Driving Forces of A-to-I Editing in Metazoans.

A-to-I Editing Sites Are a Genomically Encoded G: Implications for the Evolutionary Significance and Identification of Novel Editing Sites

On the origin and evolution of RNA editing in metazoans

The Landscape of A-to-I RNA Editome Is Shaped by Both Positive and Purifying Selection

Identification and Analysis of Evolution of A-to-I RNA Editing Sites in Kv2 Gene in Arthropoda

Autorecoding A-to-I RNA Editing Sites in Theadargene Underwent Compensatory Gains and Losses in Major Insect Clades

Evolutionary Forces on A-to-I RNA Editing Revealed by Sequencing Individual Honeybee Drones

Adaptation of A-to-I RNA Editing in Drosophila

Identification and Interpretation of A-to-I RNA Editing Events in Insect Transcriptomes

Evolutionary Analysis Reveals Regulatory and Functional Landscape of Coding and Non-Coding RNA Editing.

The Many Roles of A-to-I RNA Editing in Animals: Functional or Adaptive?

Adaptive evolution of A-to-I auto-editing site in Adar of eusocial insects

New comparative genomic evidence supporting the proteomic diversification role of A-to-I RNA editing in insects

Narrowing down the candidates of beneficial A-to-I RNA editing by comparing the recoding sites with uneditable counterparts

Origins And Evolution Of Adar-Mediated Rna Editing

Origins and Evolution of ADAR‐mediated RNA Editing

A-to-I RNA editing — immune protector and transcriptome diversifier

Comparative genomic analyses reveal evidence for adaptive A-to-I RNA editing in insect Adar gene

A-to-I RNA Editing in Honeybees Shows Signals of Adaptation and Convergent Evolution.