Abstract:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a low-cost, accessible, and noninvasive neuroprotective treatment strategy, but its efficacy and safety in acute ischemic stroke are controversial. With the publication of several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the recent results of the RESIST trial, it may be possible to identify the patient population that may (or may not) benefit from RIC. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of RIC in patients with ischemic stroke receiving different treatments by pooling data of all randomized controlled studies to date.METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Elsevier, and Web of Science databases to obtain articles in all languages from inception until May 25, 2023. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at the specified endpoint time in the trial. The secondary outcomes were change in NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and recurrence of stroke events. The safety outcomes were cardiovascular events, cerebral hemorrhage, and mortality. The quality of articles was evaluated through the Cochrane risk assessment tool. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023430073).RESULTS: There were 7,657 patients from 22 RCTs included. Compared with the control group, patients who received RIC did not have improved mRS functional outcomes, regardless of whether they received medical management, reperfusion therapy with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), or mechanical thrombectomy (MT). In the medical management group, patients who received RIC had decreased incidence of stroke recurrence (risk ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.43-0.92, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and lower follow-up NIHSS score by 1.72 points compared with the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.00001). There was no increased risk of adverse events including death or cerebral hemorrhage in the IVT or medical management group.DISCUSSION: In patients with ischemic stroke who are not eligible for reperfusion therapy, RIC did not affect mRS functional outcomes but significantly improved the NIHSS score at the follow-up endpoint and reduced stroke recurrence, without increasing the risk of cerebral hemorrhage or death. In patients who received IVT or MT, the benefit of RIC was not observed.

Remote Ischemic Conditioning May Improve Outcomes of Patients with Cerebral Small-Vessel Disease.

Remote ischemic conditioning improves cognition in patients with subcortical ischemic vascular dementia

Clinical Application of Remote Ischemic Conditioning

Remote ischemic conditioning improves cerebral hemodynamics in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis: A PET/CT‐guided randomized controlled study

Remote ischemic conditioning reduces adverse events in patients with acute ischemic stroke complicating acute myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial

Preventing Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events in High-Risk Patients With Non-disabling Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events Using Remote Ischemic Conditioning: A Single-Arm Study

Remote Ischemic Conditioning With Medical Management or Reperfusion Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Remote ischemic conditioning for stroke: clinical data, challenges, and future directions

Safety and efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning in adult moyamoya disease patients undergoing revascularization surgery: a pilot study

Daily Remote Ischemic Conditioning Can Improve Cerebral Perfusion and Slow Arterial Progression of Adult Moyamoya Disease—A Randomized Controlled Study

Abstract 61: The Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Stroke Subtypes: A Subgroup Analysis From the RESIST Trial

Differential efficacy of remote ischaemic conditioning in anterior versus posterior circulation stroke: A prespecified secondary analysis of the RICAMIS trial

Limb remote ischemic post-conditioning mitigates brain recovery in a mouse model of ischemic stroke by regulating reactive astrocytic plasticity.

Remote ischemic conditioning for stroke: A critical systematic review

Remote Ischemic Conditioning Improves Cardiovascular Function in Heart Failure Patients

Baseline systolic blood pressure, hypertension history, and efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning

Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Ischemic Stroke Subtypes: A Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis From the RESIST Trial

The Impact of Serial Remote Ischemic Conditioning on Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation and Brain Injury Related Biomarkers

Effects of Remote Ischemic Conditioning on Cerebral Hemodynamics in Ischemic Stroke

Remote ischemic conditioning after stroke: Research progress in clinical study

Safety and efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning combined with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: A multicenter, randomized, parallel-controlled clinical trial (SERIC-IVT) Study design and protocol