Visceral pleural invasion predict a poor survival among lung adenocarcinoma patients with tumor size ≤ 3cm.

Tianxiang Chen,Jizhuang Luo,Rui Wang,Haiyong Gu,Yu Gu,Qingyuan Huang,Yiyang Wang,Jiajie Zheng,Chang Gu,Xufeng Pan,Jun Yang,Yunhai Yang,Heng Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16476
2017-01-01
Oncotarget
Abstract:Introduction: The impact of visceral pleural invasion (VPI) on survival remains controversial for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study investigated the survival status of VPI among patients with lymph node-negative lung invasive adenocarcinoma smaller than 3cm. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 2537 consecutive patients with pathologic stage I lung invasive adenocarcinoma. All patients had received lobectomy and system lymph nodes resection. Patients were classified into 4 groups according to tumor size and visceral pleural invasion status. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed to evaluate survival difference between these groups. Results: 548 patients with VPI while 1989 patients without VPI were included in this study. For patients with tumor size <= 2cm, patients with VPI had significant worse DFS (HR, 4.85; 95% CI, 2.98-7.91; p = .000) and OS(HR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.59-7.78; p = .002) compared with non-VPI group. For patients with tumor size between 2-3cm, patients with VPI had significant worse DFS (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.16-2.55; p = .006) but no significant OS (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.76-2.24; p = .330) compared with non-VPI group. For patients with VPI, there were no survival difference between tumor size 2-3cm group and <= 2cm group for both DFS(HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.65-1.61; p = .939) and OS(HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.71-2.97; p = .315). Conclusions: VPI could predict a poor survival even for node-negative invasive lung adenocarcinoma patients with tumor size less than 3cm.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?