Comparative Study Between Dexmedetomidine with Bupivacaine and Bupivacaine Alone in Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control of Posterior Lumbosacral Spine Fixation Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Sawsan H A Abu El Hassan,Engy A Wahsh,Abdelmaksod Mohammed Mousa,Ahmed R N Ibrahim,Emad Lotfy Mohammed
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/dddt.s444485
IF: 4.3188
2024-02-08
Drug Design Development and Therapy
Abstract:Sawsan HA Abu El Hassan, 1 Engy A Wahsh, 2 Abdelmaksod Mohammed Mousa, 3 Ahmed RN Ibrahim, 4 Emad Lotfy Mohammed 5 1 Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; 2 Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, October 6 University, Giza, 12585, Egypt; 3 Neurological and Spine Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, October 6 University, Giza, 12585, Egypt; 4 Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha, 61421, Saudi Arabia; 5 Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Misr University for Science and Technology, Giza, Egypt Correspondence: Engy A Wahsh; Ahmed RN Ibrahim, Email ; Background: As posterior lumbosacral spine fixation surgeries are common spine procedures done nowadays due to different causes and mostly accompanied with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain, so should find effective postoperative analgesia for these patients. This study aimed to observe analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine combined with bupivacaine versus bupivacaine alone for erector spinae plane block ESPB for postoperative pain control of posterior lumbosacral spine fixation surgeries. Methods: Double-blind randomized controlled study including 90 patients who were randomly allocated into 3 groups (30 patients for each): Dexmedetomidine combined with bupivacaine (DB group), bupivacaine (B group), and saline (control) (S group). US-guided ESPB was performed preoperatively bilaterally in all patients of the 3 groups. All patients received intravenous patient-controlled postoperative analgesia with morphine and 1 gm intravenous paracetamol every 8 hours. Primary clinical outcomes were active (while mobilization) and passive (at rest) visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at first 24 hours measured every 2 hours, opioid consumption (number of PCA presses), and need for rescue analgesia. Other clinical outcomes included active and passive VAS pain score at second 24 hours, measured every 4 hours, opioid consumption, need for rescue analgesia, postoperative opioid side effects, and intraoperative dexmedetomidine side effects as bradycardia and hypotension. Results: Active and passive VAS pain scores, postoperative opioid consumption, need for rescue analgesia, and postoperative opioid side effects were significantly lower in DB group when compared to other groups (B and S groups). There were no additional intraoperative dexmedetomidine side effects as bradycardia and hypotension. The estimated effect-size r was − 0.58 and Cohen's d was − 1.46. Conclusion: Addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine 0.25% in ESPB for postoperative pain control in patients of posterior lumbosacral spine fixation surgeries resulted in lower active and passive VAS pain scores, decreased postoperative opioid consumption, need for rescue analgesia and postoperative opioid side effects without additional intraoperative dexmedetomidine side effects. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT05590234. Keywords: lumbosacral spine fixation surgeries, erector spinae plane block, ESPB, dexmedetomidine, postoperative analgesia, opioid consumption Lumbosacral spine fixation surgeries are among the most common spinal surgical operations done by neurosurgeons and spine surgeons nowadays. These procedures are done due to different causes, which may be congenital, degenerative, neoplastic, or spine trauma. The underlying purpose of this surgery is to stabilize and fuse the lumbosacral spine, reduce the patients' lower back pain, improve their quality of life, and return them to daily life activities in a short time. 1,2 The spine instrumentations in this surgery lead to severe postoperative pain that annoys most patients and may lengthen the hospital stay and prolong the rehabilitation time. 3 The postoperative pain seen immediately after lumbosacral fixation surgery is either musculoskeletal pain or acute inflammatory pain that starts with the inflammatory tissue response and decreases over time with wound healing, with a risk of becoming chronic low back pain if not treated early and adequately. 4 Multimodal analgesia techniques are applied to provide adequate postoperative analgesia and pain control. The traditional use of opioid-based analgesia techniques is usually accompanied by some annoying adverse side effects, such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and respiratory depression. Although epidural analgesia is considered the gold standard approach for control of postoperative pain and proper postoperative analgesia, in the lumbosacral spine fixation surgery, the insertion of epidural catheter preoperatively o -Abstract Truncated-
pharmacology & pharmacy,chemistry, medicinal