Early Snowmelt Significantly Enhances Boreal Springtime Carbon Uptake.

Jouni Pulliainen,Mika Aurela,Tuomas Laurila,Tuula Aalto,Matias Takala,Miia Salminen,Markku Kulmala,Alan Barr,Martin Heimann,Anders Lindroth,Ari Laaksonen,Chris Derksen,Annikki Makela,Tiina Markkanen,Juha Lemmetyinen,Jouni Susiluoto,Sigrid Dengel,Ivan Mammarella,Juha-Pekka Tuovinen,Timo Vesala
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707889114
2017-01-01
Abstract:Significance We quantified a 36-y trend of advanced spring recovery of carbon uptake across the northern hemisphere boreal evergreen forest zone. From this trend, we estimated the corresponding change in global gross primary production (GPP) and further quantified the magnitude and spatiotemporal variability of spring GPP, that is, the cross-photosynthetic carbon uptake by forest. Our main findings are the following: (i) We developed a proxy indicator for spring recovery from in situ flux data on CO2 exchange and recent satellite snowmelt products and (ii) we established a relation between spring recovery and carbon uptake to assess changes in springtime carbon exchange showing a major advance in the CO2 sink. We determine the annual timing of spring recovery from space-borne microwave radiometer observations across northern hemisphere boreal evergreen forests for 1979–2014. We find a trend of advanced spring recovery of carbon uptake for this period, with a total average shift of 8.1 d (2.3 d/decade). We use this trend to estimate the corresponding changes in gross primary production (GPP) by applying in situ carbon flux observations. Micrometeorological CO2 measurements at four sites in northern Europe and North America indicate that such an advance in spring recovery would have increased the January–June GPP sum by 29 g⋅C⋅m−2 [8.4 g⋅C⋅m−2 (3.7%)/decade]. We find this sensitivity of the measured springtime GPP to the spring recovery to be in accordance with the corresponding sensitivity derived from simulations with a land ecosystem model coupled to a global circulation model. The model-predicted increase in springtime cumulative GPP was 0.035 Pg/decade [15.5 g⋅C⋅m−2 (6.8%)/decade] for Eurasian forests and 0.017 Pg/decade for forests in North America [9.8 g⋅C⋅m−2 (4.4%)/decade]. This change in the springtime sum of GPP related to the timing of spring snowmelt is quantified here for boreal evergreen forests.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?