Abstract:One of the most fundamental problems in genome rearrangement studies is the (genomic) distance problem. It is typically formulated as finding the minimum number of rearrangements under a model that are needed to transform one genome into the other. A powerful multi-chromosomal model is the Double Cut and Join (DCJ) model.While the DCJ model is not able to deal with some situations that occur in practice, like duplicated or lost regions, it was extended over time to handle these cases. First, it was extended to the DCJ-indel model, solving the issue of lost markers. Later ILP-solutions for so called natural genomes , in which each genomic region may occur an arbitrary number of times, were developed, enabling in theory to solve the distance problem for any pair of genomes. However, some theoretical and practical issues remained unsolved. On the theoretical side of things, there exist two disparate views of the DCJ-indel model, motivated in the same way, but with different conceptualizations that could not be reconciled so far. On the practical side, while ILP solutions for natural genomes typically perform well on telomere to telomere resolved genomes, they have been shown in recent years to quickly loose performance on genomes with a large number of contigs or linear chromosomes. This has been linked to a particular technique, namely capping . Simply put, capping circularizes linear chromosomes by concatenating them during solving time, increasing the solution space of the ILP superexponentially. Recently, we introduced a new conceptualization of the DCJ-indel model within the context of another rearrangement problem. In this manuscript, we will apply this new conceptualization to the distance problem. In doing this, we uncover the relation between the disparate conceptualizations of the DCJ-indel model. We are also able to derive an ILP solution to the distance problem that does not rely on capping. This solution significantly improves upon the performance of previous solutions on genomes with high numbers of contigs while still solving the problem exactly and being competitive in performance otherwise. We demonstrate the performance advantage on simulated genomes as well as showing its practical usefulness in an analysis of 11 Drosophila genomes.

RegCloser: a robust regression approach to closing genome gaps

TGS-GapCloser: A fast and accurate gap closer for large genomes with low coverage of error-prone long reads

GapReduce: A Gap Filling Algorithm Based on Partitioned Read Sets

Utilizing Deep Neural Networks to Fill Gaps in Small Genomes

Sequence Repetitiveness Quantification and De Novo Repeat Detection by Weighted K-Mer Coverage.

GapPredict: A Language Model for Resolving Gaps in Draft Genome Assemblies

DEGAP: Dynamic elongation of a genome assembly path

ContigScape: a Cytoscape Plugin Facilitating Microbial Genome Gap Closing

Comprehensive Evaluation of Genome Gap-Filling Tools Utilizing Long Reads

GCI: a continuity inspector for complete genome assembly

RegScaf: a regression approach to scaffolding

Accurate Loop Calling for 3D Genomic Data with Cloops

A generalizable framework for unlocking missing reactions in genome-scale metabolic networks using deep learning

Estimation of genomic characteristics by analyzing k-mer frequency in de novo genome projects

GeneScissors: a comprehensive approach to detecting and correcting spurious transcriptome inference owing to RNA-seq reads misalignment.

Filling gaps of genome scaffolds via probabilistic searching optical maps against assembly graph

Recombinations, chains and caps: resolving problems with the DCJ-indel model

Coding genomes with gapped pattern graph convolutional network

SRBreak: A Read-Depth and Split-Read Framework to Identify Breakpoints of Different Events Inside Simple Copy-Number Variable Regions

A novel method addressing NGS-based mappability bias for sensitive detection of DNA alterations

Efficient assembly of nanopore reads via highly accurate and intact error correction