Abstract:In addition to soluble factors and stromal cells, the mechanical properties of extracellular matrix (ECM) are considered to be an important component of tumor microenvironment. In particular, substrate stiffness is a mechanical characteristic of the ECM by which certain anchorage cells sense and respond to a variety of cellular behaviors. At the same time, clinical studies have observed that substrate stiffness was increased during tumorigenesis, which could promote tumor malignant transformation and metastasis. However, the biomechanical behavior of tumor cells and the underlying mechanotransduction pathways remain unclear. Here, using stiffness‐regulable polyacrylamide (PAA) substrates to simulate the tissue stiffness at different progress stages of breast cancer in vitro, we found that moderate substrate stiffness induced the emergence of malignant phenotypes and further unregulated breast cancer cell motility. Subcellular structure observation showed that moderate substrate stiffness promote the formation of leading‐edge protrusion by accelerating focal adhesion maturation and polarizing intracellular traction force distribution. Moreover, the substrate stiffness directly activated integrin β1 and focal adhesion kinase (FAK), which accelerate focal adhesion (FA) maturation and induce the downstream cascades of intracellular signals of the RhoA/ROCK pathway. Interestingly, the differential regulatory mechanism between two ROCK isoforms (ROCK1 and ROCK2) in cell motility and mechanotransduction was clearly identified. ROCK1 phosphorylated the myosin‐regulatory light chain (MRLC) and facilitated the generation of traction force, while ROCK2 phosphorylated cofilin and regulated the cytoskeletal remodeling by suppressing F‐actin depolymerization. The ROCK isoforms differentially regulated the pathways of RhoA/ROCK1/p‐MLC and RhoA/ROCK2/p‐cofilin in a coordinate fashion to modulate breast cancer cell motility in a substrate stiffness‐dependent manner via integrin β1‐activated FAK signaling. Our findings provide new insights into the mechanisms of matrix mechanical property‐induced cancer cell migration and malignant behaviors. Taming these physical forces by implanting scaffolds with specific stiffness or by inhibiting specific ROCK isoforms could have potential implications for improving therapeutic outcomes in cancer.Support or Funding InformationThis work was supported, in part or in whole, by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11772088, 31470906, 31700811, 11802056, and 31800780).This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.

Substrate stiffness regulated migration and angiogenesis potential of A549 cells and HUVECs.

Effects of Substrate Stiffness on the Biological Behavior of Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells

The Substrate Stiffness at Physiological Range Significantly Modulates Vascular Cell Behavior.

Dynamically Softened Substrate Regulates Malignancy of Breast Tumor Cells

Effects of substrate stiffness on the viscoelasticity and migration of prostate cancer cells examined by atomic force microscopy

Relative rigidity of cell-substrate effects on hepatic and hepatocellular carcinoma cell migration.

Effects of substrate rigidity on human hepatic and hepatocellular carcinoma cell migration behavior

Regulation of Matrix Stiffness on the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition of Breast Cancer Cells under Hypoxia Environment

Substrate Stiffness Combined with Hepatocyte Growth Factor Modulates Endothelial Cell Behavior

Effects of substrate stiffness on the migration of hepatic and hepatoma carcinoma cells

Substrate stiffness modulates integrin α5 expression and ECM-associated gene expression in fibroblasts

Effects of Substrate Stiffness on Confluent Growth of Hepatic and Hepatoma Carcinoma Cells

ROCK isoforms differentially modulate cancer cell motility by mechanosensing the substrate stiffness

Substrate Stiffness Coupling TGF-β1 Modulates Migration and Traction Force of MDA-MB-231 Human Breast Cancer Cells in Vitro

Effect of substrate stiffness on hepatocyte migration and cellular Young's modulus

Substrate Stiffness-Regulated Matrix Metalloproteinase Output in Myocardial Cells and Cardiac Fibroblasts: Implications for Myocardial Fibrosis.

Substrate Stiffness Affects Endothelial Cell Junctions and MAPK Signaling Pathway

Effect of stiffness of substrate on vascular endothelial cell growth and proliferation

Unveiling the Mechanotransduction Mechanism of Substrate Stiffness‐modulated Cancer Cell Motility Via ROCK1 and ROCK2 Differentially Regulated Manner

Substrate Stiffness Modulates the Growth, Phenotype, and Chemoresistance of Ovarian Cancer Cells

Differential modulation of cell morphology, migration, and Neuropilin-1 expression in cancer and non-cancer cell lines by substrate stiffness