Effect of sequential high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy and non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation in patients with difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation after extubation on respiratory mechanics
Shi-Ya Wang,Han-Wen Liang,Guang-Sheng Lu,Zhen-Jie Jiang,Bao-Zhu Zhang,Qiu-Xue Deng,Qing-Wen Sun,Zhi-Min Lin,Qiang Chen,Chun Yang,Yuan-Da Xu,Ling Sang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-3408
IF: 3.616
2021-08-01
Annals of Translational Medicine
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Patients with difficult weaning who undergo mechanical ventilation are more likely to be at risk of reintubation and the sequential use of oxygen therapy after extubation is a concern for clinicians. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare the effects of transnasal high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy and non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation (NIV) on respiratory mechanics in patients with difficult weaning.METHODS: The present study was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. Twenty-nine patients with difficult weaning off invasive mechanical ventilation from the Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, from December 2018 to April 2021, were included. Within 48 h after extubation, alternate respiratory support with HFNC and NIV was provided. Relevant indicators were recorded after each support mode had been maintained for at least 60 min. These included esophageal pressure (Pes), gastric pressure (Pga), transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi), pressure-time product of Pes (PTPes), pressure-time product of Pga (PTPga), pressure-time product of Pdi (PTPdi), ratio of the PTPdi to the PTPes (PTPdi/PTPes), and ratio of the Pes to the Pdi (Pes/Pdi), diaphragmatic electromyogram (EMGdi), percentage of esophageal pressure coefficient of variation (CVes%),diaphragmatic electromyogram coefficient of variation (CVEMG),inspiratory time (Ti), expiratory time (Te) and respiratory cycle time (Ttot).RESULTS: Of the 29 patients included, 22 were males and 7 were females [age: 63.97±15.34 years, Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Estimation II (APACHE II) score: 18.00±5.63]. The CVes% and the Pes/Pdi were significantly higher in patients with NIV than HFNC using 40 L/min, CVes%: 9 (-6, 20) <i>vs.</i> -7 (-23, 6) and Pes/Pdi: 0.17 (-0.1, 0.53), <i>vs.</i> -0.12 (-0.43, 0.08) (P<0.05). The remaining indicators were not statistically different.CONCLUSIONS: The sequential NIV and HFNC can be tolerated in patients with such difficult weaning off mechanical ventilation after extubation, and more patients tend to choose HFNC subjectively. Compared with HFNC, NIV reduces the work of adjunctive respiratory muscle, but the patient's Pes dispersion is high when NIV is used, and it is necessary to pay attention to patient-ventilator coordination in clinical practice. We recommend alternating HFNC and NIV during the sequential respiratory therapy after extubation.
oncology,medicine, research & experimental