Abstract:Estimating the effort to develop a software system is an important project management concern. There are a number of different effort estimation techniques currently in use in the software industry. They fall into three general categories: expert judgment-based techniques, algorithmic model-based techniques and learning-oriented techniques. Expert judgment-based techniques are the techniques in most frequent use. They are useful in the absence of quantified, empirical data. However, ″intuitive″ processes constitute a major part of the expert estimation. It is difficult to articulate the estimation process and achieve organizational learning. Algorithmic model-based techniques attempt to represent the relationship between effort and one or more project characteristics. The existing algorithmic models, however, fail to produce accurate estimates of the development effort. There are four main disadvantages with these models. First, there is the problem of software sizing. Obtaining consistent size estimates and interpreting such estimates require high skill levels and good judgment. Secondly, there is the issue of historical data. Researchers have proposed models based on site-specific historical data, so these models can't be applied to local development circumstances. Thirdly, the dominant method of data analysis has been in linear regression. A good regression model needs a relatively large dataset which can be a problem in the software estimation field. Furthermore, the underlying assumptions of regression analysis are often questionable. Finally, many models estimate the effort for the later stages of the development process but almost ignore the early stages. Learning-oriented techniques are based on artificial intelligence techniques. Learning-oriented techniques don't require any function form assumption, as opposed to algorithmic models and they are good at modeling complex non-linear relationships. The performance of the learning-oriented techniques is to a large degree dependent on the large dataset for training or analogy. Each of the existing techniques for effort estimation has its advantages and disadvantages. No single technique is best for all situations, and all techniques are challenged by the rapid pace of change in the software technology. In order to improve estimation accuracy, a software development organization should: (1) select proper estimation techniques according to specific project characteristics and information availability; (2) combine more estimation techniques to improve effort estimates; (3) adapt algorithmic models to local circumstances; (4) develop their own store of projects; (5) estimate the effort for the whole development process, considering the effort of the early stages sufficiently.

An Empirical Analysis of Three-Stage Data-Preprocessing for Analogy-Based Software Effort Estimation on the ISBSG Data.

A Comparison of Effort Estimation Techniques in Software Development Projects

A Study of Project Selection and Feature Weighting for Analogy Based Software Cost Estimation

An Experience-Based Approach for Test Execution Effort Estimation

Optimization Of Feature Weights And Number Of Neighbors For Analogy Based Cost Estimation In Software Project Management

Estimate Test Execution Effort at an Early Stage: an Empirical Study

A Study of the Non-Linear Adjustment for Analogy Based Software Cost Estimation

A Naive Bayesian Belief Network Model for Predicting Effort Deviation Rate in Software Testing

Comparison and Assessment of Improved Grey Relation Analysis for Software Development Effort Estimation

An Empirical Analysis of Data Preprocessing for Machine Learning-Based Software Cost Estimation

A Study of Genetic Algorithm for Project Selection for Analogy Based Software Cost Estimation

Effect of data preprocessing on software effort estimation

A Study Of Analogy Based Sampling For Interval Based Cost Estimation For Software Project Management

Missing Data Imputation Based on Low-Rank Recovery and Semi-Supervised Regression for Software Effort Estimation

Beyond Numbers: Creating Analogies to Enhance Data Comprehension and Communication with Generative AI

An improved analogy-rule based software effort estimation using HTRR-RNN in software project management

An Empirical Study on the Procedure to Derive Software Quality Estimation Models

A Study of Improving the Accuracy of Software Effort Estimation Using Linearly Weighted Combinations

Optimized fuzzy clustering‐based k‐nearest neighbors imputation for mixed missing data in software development effort estimation

Pareto Efficient Multi Objective Optimization for Local Tuning of Analogy Based Estimation

An Empirical Study of Dynamic Incomplete-Case Nearest Neighbor Imputation in Software Quality Data.