Abstract:As an important method of propagating and distributing product information,word-of-mouth significantly influences consumers' purchase decisions and has attracted tremendous research interests from academia.Since the 1960s,researchers have gradually reached some consensus on the motivation and influential factors of word-of-mouth.Moreover,the related empirical studies have achieved rich results as well.However,relatively few researchers have studied this topic by developing analytical models.Consumers' prior expectation on the product quality is usually assumed to be given in the literature.Very few papers assume it to be the firm's controllable variable or consider the influence of discrepancy between the prior expectation and the actual performance on word-of-mouth.Based on the previous studies,this paper converts consumers' expected quality into products' advertised quality,which can be directly controlled by advertising or indirectly influenced by word-of-mouth.In addition,we consider the discrepancy between the prior expectation and the actual performance.Sensitive to this discrepancy and the level of discrepancy sensitivity are introduced into our model as two significant exogenous variables.We build a two-stage model and obtain the advertised optimal quality and pricing strategy.Influences of ad cost,and discrepancy between the prior expectation and the actual performance on the optimal strategies and profits are also discussed.Numerical analysis is conducted to further explore our findings.Results showed that the proportion of consumers who are sensitive to discrepancy and the level of discrepancy sensitivity has strong influence on firm's optimal strategies.When the ad cost is medium,the firm will choose a low ad intensity (i.e.the advertised quality is lower than the actual quality) if the proportion of consumers who are sensitive to discrepancy is large enough.Otherwise,it will choose a high ad'intensity (i.e.the advertised quality is smaller than the true quality).The higher the actual quality is,the more this firm is inclined to invest in the low ad intensity if the proportion of consumers who are sensitive to discrepancy is small enough.When the ad cost medium,the low ad intensity will be the firm's optimal strategy,and the ad intensity will increase with the level of discrepancy sensitivity.When the ad cost is not that high,the more sensitive to discrepancy consumers is,the more inclined the company is to invest in the highest ad intensity.

An analytical model of the relationship between product quality and advertising.

Modeling the impact of product quality on dynamic pricing and advertising policies

Influence of disconfirmation and word-of-mouth on advertising strategy

Informing, Transforming, and Persuading: Disentangling the Multiple Effects of Advertising on Brand Choice Decisions

Quality of an experience good: the interaction of price and advertising as a determining factor

A Model for Predictive Measurements of Advertising Effectiveness

Better Product Quality May Lead to Lower Product Price

Dynamic Pricing, Reference Price, and Price-Quality Relationship

Advertising effects in Sznajd marketing model

Social Media Marketing, Quality Signaling, and the Goldilocks Principle

Advertising and brand attitudes: Evidence from 575 brands over five years

The Optimal Competitive Strategy of Advertising and Product Quality for a Duopolistic Firm Based on Goodwill

When Better Quality or Higher Goodwill Can Result in Lower Product Price: A Dynamic Analysis.

Optimal Advertising for Information Products

A Dynamic Evolution Model of Human Opinion As Affected by Advertising

Dynamic optimal control policy in advertising price and quality

A dynamic advertising model with reference price effect

A Systematic Analysis of the Relationship Between Advertising and Marketing

Implications of Advertising Lag on the Dynamic Optimal Decisions in an O2O Supply Chain

On dynamic policies for quality, price and advertising