Abstract:In this article, an effective superpixel‐guided locality preserving projection and spatial–spectral classification method is proposed for hyperspectral image classification. In this method, a superpixel‐guided locality preserving projection technique is applied to extract low‐dimensional features. Compared with the fixed‐window neighbourhood of a pixel, the spatial–adaptive superpixel is beneficial to reasonably excavate spatial–spectral information and generate more distinguishing features. In addition, in the proposed framework, a superpixel‐guided postprocessing is designed, which adopts the superpixel structure as spatial constraint to optimize the initial classification result and realizes the great improvement of classification performance. Experiments conducted on two datasets demonstrate that the proposed method has significant advantages in hyperspectral image classification performance compared with several well‐known approaches. Locality preserving projection (LPP) is a typical feature extraction method based on spectral information for hyperspectral image (HSI) classification. Recently, to improve the classification performance, the spatial information of HSI has been applied in the LPP method. However, for most of spatial–spectral‐based LPP methods, they explore the spatial–spectral information within a fixed local window, which cannot be appropriate to the irregular‐shape ground objects in HSI. To over this issue, an effective superpixel‐guided LPP and spatial–spectral classification method are proposed, in which the spatial–adaptive structure information is fully excavated for HSI classification. Specifically, superpixel segmentation is first conducted on the HSI to generate shape‐adaptive homogeneous subregions. Then, to learn more discriminative projection, the neighbourhood graph for LPP is constructed based on spatial–spectral similarity, in which pixels within the same superpixel are connected. Finally, the obtained projection feature is input a classifier to yield the initial classification result, and the edge information of ground objects captured by superpixels is utilized to optimize the initial classification result. Experiments on two real hyperspectral datasets demonstrate that the proposed superpixel‐guided and spatial–spectral classification method significantly outperforms the other well‐known techniques for HSI classification.

Nonlocal-Similarity-Based Sparse Coding for Hyperspectral Imagery Classification

Group Sparse Representation Based on Nonlocal Spatial and Local Spectral Similarity for Hyperspectral Imagery Classification

A Hyperspectral Image Classification Method Based on the Nonlocal Attention Mechanism of a Multiscale Convolutional Neural Network.

Local Similarity Constraint-Based Sparse Algorithm for Hyperspectral Target Detection

A Nonlocal Weighted Joint Sparse Representation Classification Method for Hyperspectral Imagery

Hyperspectral image classification via nonlocal joint kernel sparse representation based on local covariance

A Spectral-Texture Kernel-Based Classification Method for Hyperspectral Images.

Hyperspectral Image Classification Via Joint Sparse Representation of Multi-layer Superpixles.

Spectral–Spatial Prototype Learning-Based Nearest Neighbor Classifier for Hyperspectral Images

Coupled Compressed Sensing Inspired Sparse Spatial-Spectral LSSVM for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Hyperspectral Image Classification Via Sparse Code Histogram

Local Correntropy Matrix Representation for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Class-Oriented Weighted Kernel Sparse Representation with Region-Level Kernel for Hyperspectral Imagery Classification.

Local Similarity-Based Spatial–Spectral Fusion Hyperspectral Image Classification With Deep CNN and Gabor Filtering

A Complementary Spectral-Spatial Method for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Local Matrix Feature-Based Kernel Joint Sparse Representation for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Weighted Spectral-Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral Images Via Class-Specific Band Contribution.

Locally Homogeneous Covariance Matrix Representation for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Center-similarity spectral-spatial attention network for hyperspectral image classification

Superpixel‐guided locality preserving projection and spatial–spectral classification for hyperspectral image

Local and Global Spectral Features for Hyperspectral Image Classification