Evaluating and Comparing Performances of Topographic Correction Methods Based on Multi-Source DEMs and Landsat-8 OLI Data

Qiong Wu,Yuan Jin,Hui Fan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1222101
IF: 3.531
2016-01-01
International Journal of Remote Sensing
Abstract:Topographic correction is a crucial and challenging step in interpreting optical remote-sensing images of extremely complex terrain environments due to the lack of universally suitable correction algorithms and digital elevation models DEMs of adequate resolution and quality. The free availability of open source global DEMs provides an unprecedented opportunity to remove topographic effects associated with remote-sensing data in remote and rugged mountain terrains. This study evaluated the performances of seven topographic correction methods including C-correction C, Cosine C-correction CC, Minnaert correction M, Sun–canopy–sensor SCS correction S, SCS+C-correction SC, Teillet regression correction TR, and the Terrain illumination correction model TI based on multi-source DEMs local topographic map, Shuttle Radar Topography Mission SRTM DEM filled-finished A/B and the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer ASTER global digital elevation model GDEM data sets and Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager OLI data using visual and statistical evaluation strategies. Overall, these investigated topographic correction methods removed topographic effects associated with Landsat-8 OLI data to varying degrees. However, the performances of these methods generally depend on the use of different DEMs and evaluation strategies. Among these correction methods, the SCS+C-correction performed best and was less sensitive to the use of different DEMs. The performances of topographic corrections based on free and open-access DEMs were generally better than or comparable to those based on local topographic maps. In particular, the topographic correction performance was greatly improved using the SRTM filled-finished B FFB data set with a resampling scheme based on the average value within a 3 × 3 pixel window. Nevertheless, further quantitative investigation is needed to determine the relative importance of DEMs and evaluation strategies used to select topographic correction methods.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?