The Labor Judicial Expert from Sergipe State, Brazil and Propositions of Use of Tools Ergonomic in the Sustenance of Causal Connections in Disturbances Bone-Muscle.

Marcos André Santos Guedes,Maria Goretti Fernandes,Marcelo Márcio Soares
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58640-3_51
2017-01-01
Abstract:The judgment in many of the labor lawsuits involving litigations provoked by musculoskeletal disorders is made through the production of expert evidence produced by judicial experts. Such evidence must naturally be clothed with the most compelling scientific methodologies. In this context, the objective of this study was to discuss the profile of the judicial expert in proceedings carried out in one of the sticks of work in Sergipe (Brazil) combined with the hypothesis of using ergonomic tools to enable the technical arguments of these expert professionals to be demonstrated, in order to demonstrate. That it is possible the use of ergonomic methodologies as a reinforcer of the conclusions of nexo-causal in lides caused by musculoskeletal constraints. In view of the analysis made in this study, it was concluded that it is entirely feasible to include in the labor judicial processes a multidisciplinary methodology of investigation of osteomuscular causal neurosis, shared with investigative tools of an ergonomic nature, and which predominates experts with training in the health area when in Specific processes of dealing with the causal nexus in musculoskeletal constraints.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?