Abstract:Virtual integration techniques focus on building architectural models of systems that can be analyzed early in the design cycle to try to lower cost, reduce risk, and improve quality of complex embedded systems. Given appropriate architectural descriptions, assume/guarantee contracts, and compositional reasoning rules, these techniques can be used to prove important safety properties about the architecture prior to system construction. For these proofs to be meaningful, each leaf-level component contract must be realizable; i.e., it is possible to construct a component such that for any input allowed by the contract assumptions, there is some output value that the component can produce that satisfies the contract guarantees. We have recently proposed (in [1]) a contract-based realizability checking algorithm for assume/guarantee contracts over infinite theories supported by SMT solvers such as linear integer/real arithmetic and uninterpreted functions. In that work, we used an SMT solver and an algorithm similar to k-induction to establish the realizability of a contract, and justified our approach via a hand proof. Given the central importance of realizability to our virtual integration approach, we wanted additional confidence that our approach was sound. This paper describes a complete formalization of the approach in the Coq proof and specification language. During formalization, we found several small mistakes and missing assumptions in our reasoning. Although these did not compromise the correctness of the algorithm used in the checking tools, they point to the value of machine-checked formalization. In addition, we believe this is the first machine-checked formalization for a realizability algorithm.

A Proof System for MSVL Programs in Coq.

The Verification of PLC Program Based on Interactive Theorem Proving Tool COQ

Verifying Programs Using Abstraction and Theorem Proving.

Coq Modulo Theory - Short Paper

CoqQ: Foundational Verification of Quantum Programs

VST-A: A Foundationally Sound Annotation Verifier

Formal Verification of Cp Systems Using Coq

SMLtoCoq: Automated Generation of Coq Specifications and Proof Obligations from SML Programs with Contracts

Formal Proof of a Machine Closed Theorem in Coq

Machine-Checked Proofs For Realizability Checking Algorithms

A Theorem Prover for Quantum Hoare Logic and Its Applications

Completely Automated Equivalence Proofs

A Natural Formalized Proof Language

Propositional Calculus in Coq

Towards Uniform Certification in QBF

Program Calculation in Coq

Reliably Reproducing Machine-Checked Proofs with the Coq Platform

Don't Call Us, We'll Call You: Towards Mixed-Initiative Interactive Proof Assistants for Programming Language Theory

A Formalization of Operads in Coq

On QBF Proofs and Preprocessing

Verifying Java Programs by Theorem Prover HOL