Abstract:Conductance-based equations for electrically active cells form one of the most widely studied mathematical frameworks in computational biology. This framework, as expressed through a set of differential equations by Hodgkin and Huxley, synthesizes the impact of ionic currents on a cell's voltage--and the highly nonlinear impact of that voltage back on the currents themselves--into the rapid push and pull of the action potential. Later studies confirmed that these cellular dynamics are orchestrated by individual ion channels, whose conformational changes regulate the conductance of each ionic current. Thus, kinetic equations familiar from physical chemistry are the natural setting for describing conductances; for small-to-moderate numbers of channels, these will predict fluctuations in conductances and stochasticity in the resulting action potentials. At first glance, the kinetic equations provide a far more complex (and higher-dimensional) description than the original Hodgkin-Huxley equations or their counterparts. This has prompted more than a decade of efforts to capture channel fluctuations with noise terms added to the equations of Hodgkin-Huxley type. Many of these approaches, while intuitively appealing, produce quantitative errors when compared to kinetic equations; others, as only very recently demonstrated, are both accurate and relatively simple. We review what works, what doesn't, and why, seeking to build a bridge to well-established results for the deterministic equations of Hodgkin-Huxley type as well as to more modern models of ion channel dynamics. As such, we hope that this review will speed emerging studies of how channel noise modulates electrophysiological dynamics and function. We supply user-friendly MATLAB simulation code of these stochastic versions of the Hodgkin-Huxley equations on the ModelDB website (accession number 138950) and http://www.amath.washington.edu/~etsb/tutorials.html.

Random Pulse Input Versus Continuous Current Plus White Noise: Are They Equivalent?

Integrate-and-fire and Hodgkin-Huxley Models with Current Inputs

Behavior of Integrate-And-Fire and Hodgkin-Huxley Models with Correlated Inputs

Variability of Firing of Hodgkin-Huxley and FitzHugh-Nagumo Neurons with Stochastic Synaptic Input

A review of the integrate-and-fire neuron model: II. Inhomogeneous synaptic input and network properties

Response of the Hodgkin-Huxley neuron to a periodic sequence of biphasic pulses

Impact of Poisson Synaptic Inputs with a Changing Rate on Weak-Signal Processing

Response of a Hodgkin-Huxley neuron to a high-frequency input

A Comparison Between Abstract and Biophysical Neuron Models

The interplay of common noise and finite pulses on biological neurons

How input fluctuations reshape the dynamics of a biological switching system

A Review of the Integrate-and-fire Neuron Model: I. Homogeneous Synaptic Input

Increasing Inhibitory Inputincreasesneuronal Firing Rate: Why and When? Diffusion Process Cases

Dynamics of the Exponential Integrate-and-fire Model with Slow Currents and Adaptation

Dynamics of Current-Based, Poisson Driven, Integrate-And-Fire Neuronal Networks

Detectable and Undetectable Input Signals for the Integrate-and-fire Model

Stochastic resonance in Hodgkin-Huxley neuron induced by unreliable synaptic transmission.

A model for the periodic synaptic inhibition of a neuronal oscillator

Mapping Input Noise to Escape Noise in Integrate-and-fire neurons: A Level-Crossing Approach

On stochastic differential equation models for ion channel noise in Hodgkin-Huxley neurons

The What and Where of Adding Channel Noise to the Hodgkin-Huxley Equations