Investigation Of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (Gist) Care Management In Gist Patients (Pts) Receiving Short-Term Versus Long-Term Imatinib (Im) Adjuvant Therapy: A Chart Review Analysis.

Guérin Annie,Sasane Medha,Gauthier Geneviève,Schwiep Frances,Keir Christopher Hunt,Wu Eric Q
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.30.34_suppl.195
IF: 45.3
2012-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:195 Background: Although optimal duration of adjuvant IM therapy in Kit+ GIST pts is unknown, the NCCN guidelines recommend treatment for ≥36 months in high-risk pts based on clinical trials showing reduced risk of recurrence and mortality in pts receiving long-term adjuvant IM. The objective of this study was to investigate clinicians' recurrence risk assessment and GIST management in patients receiving adjuvant IM for short- (6-12 months) vs. long-term (≥24 months) in community practice.GIST-related and treatment characteristic information on adult pts with primary resectable Kit+ GIST initiating IM ≤84 days after surgery (short-term: 411 pts; long-term: 408 pts) was collected from 320 U.S. oncologists using an online data collection form. In addition, physician prescribing patterns and perception of risk assessment and IM duration were collected.Indicators of risk (tumor size, mitotic count, and tumor location) were significantly associated with IM treatment duration. Tumor rupture status did not impact IM duration, except when unknown, in which case pts had longer IM duration. About 50% of pts had not been tested for Kit mutation; 31% of physicians reported that it would not have changed therapy/management or were not aware of how results should have impacted GIST management. Among short-term pts for whom physicians reported a reason for IM discontinuation, main reasons included non-severe adverse events, completion of the 1-year treatment scheduled, economic constraint/health plan coverage change, and pts' preference. Overall, 77.8% of surveyed physicians reported that pt risk profile drove their decision of continuing IM over an extended period of time. However, in practice 39.9% of the short-term pts and 48.8% of the long-term pts had a high risk profile as assessed by Fletcher classification; suggesting a lack of consistency between treatment related opinions and practice.These observed discrepancies highlight the need for standardization of risk assessment practices and education among community oncologists and pts.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?