Pelvic fixation for posterior lumbosacral hemivertebra resection and long fusion in adult spinal deformity
李松,朱泽章,毛赛虎,马彦宇,朱奕同,刘臻,史本龙,孙旭,乔军,王斌,俞杨,邱勇
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20220110-00015
2022-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate whether pelvic fixation is needed in patients undergoing posterior lumbosacral hemivertebra (LSHV) resection and long fusion.Methods:All 32 adult spinal deformity patients with posterior hemivertebra (HV) resection and long segment fixation treated from April 2005 to August 2019 were analyzed retrospectively, including 12 males and 20 females with a mean age of 32.9±8.8 years. According to the state of coronal balance distance (CBD), there were 15 cases of type A (preoperative CBD≤ 30 mm), 1 case of type B (preoperative CBD>30 mm and C
7 plumb line offset to the concave side), and 16 cases of type C (preoperative CBD>30 mm and C
7 plumb line offset to the convex side). The clinical and imaging data before operation, immediately after operation and at the last follow-up were collected, and the short-term and long-term complications related to operation were recorded. The improvement of Cobb angle and coronal balance of primary curve and compensatory curve were evaluated on the whole spine frontal and lateral X-ray films, and the change of coronal balance type after operation was evaluated. According to the mode of distal internal fixation, the patients were divided into two groups: PF group (pelvic fixation): distal fixation to iliac or sacroiliac; NPF group (non-pelvic fixation): distal fixation to L
5 or S
1.
Results:All 32 patients were followed up with an average time of 3.9±2.6 years (range 2-11 years). The Cobb angle of primary curve in PF and NPF groups were 42.6°±13.5° and 41.3°±10.9° respectively before operation, and corrected to 13.1°±5.4° and 17.7°±5.8° respectively after operation. It maintained at 13.4°±5.1°and 18.5°±6.7° in the two groups at the last follow-up, respectively (
FPF=32.58,
FNPF=28.64,
P<0.001). The correction rates were 69.3%±11.8% and 57.6%±10.3%, respectively (
t=2.14,
P=0.012). The compensatory curves of in the two groups were corrected from 54.9°±14.8° and 46.8°±13.6° before operation to 17.3°±9.6° and 15.4°±8.4° after operation. It also maintained at 18.5°±8.8°and 17.6°±9.5° in the two groups at the last follow-up, respectively (
FPF=42.97,
FNPF=38.56,
P<0.001). The correction rates were 68.4%±16.7% and 67.2%±14.9%, respectively (
t=0.17,
P=0.849) in the two groups. In PF group, the primary and compensatory curve were similar (69.3%±11.8%
vs. 68.4%±16.7%,
t=0.15,
P=0.837), while the correction rate of compensatory curve in NPF group was significantly higher than that of the primary curve (67.2%±14.9%
vs. 57.6%±10.3%,
t=2.13,
P=0.013). Coronal decompensation occurred in 12 patients (12/32, 37.5%). The CBD in PF and NPF groups was corrected from 33.3±11.2 mm and 28.8±8.1 mm preoperatively to 18.5±3.5 mm and 27.1±6.8 mm postoperatively, respectively, and it showed no significant change at the last follow-up (
FPF=41.61,
P<0.001;
FNPF=0.38,
P=0.896). While the CBD in PF group was significantly better than that in NPF group (
t=3.23,
P=0.002;
t=2.94,
P=0.008). The incidence of coronal decompensation in PF group was 0%, which was significantly lower than 50% (12/24) in NPF group (χ
2=6.40,
P=0.014). In addition, 6 cases in PF group were type C coronal decompensation before operation, and the coronal balance was corrected to type A after surgery (100%). Among 10 patients with type C coronal decompensation in NFP, 4 (40%) patients returned to type A after operation, and the difference was statistically significant (6/6
vs. 4/10, χ
2=5.76,
P=0.034).
Conclusion:Coronal decompensation (12/32, 37.5%) is not rare in patients after posterior LSHV resection and long fusion. Attention should be paid to the match of the corrections between lumbosacral deformity and compensatory curve, which is of great significance in coronal balance reconstruction. Pelvic fixation is helpful to reduce the incidence of postoperative coronal decompensation, especially for the type C patients.