Forensic DNA Phenotyping: a review on SNP Panels, Genotyping Techniques, and Prediction Models

Nuria Terrado-Ortuño,Patrick May
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owae013
2024-03-11
Forensic Sciences Research
Abstract:Abstract In the past few years, forensic DNA phenotyping has attracted a strong interest in the forensic research. Among the increasing publications, many have focused on testing the available panels to infer biogeographical ancestry on less represented populations and understanding the genetic mechanisms underlying externally visible characteristics. However, there are currently no publications that gather all the existing panels limited to forensic DNA phenotyping and discuss the main technical limitations of the technique. In this review, we performed a bibliographic search in Scopus database of phenotyping-related literature, which resulted in a total of 48, 43 and 15 panels for biogeographical ancestry, externally visible characteristics and both traits inference, respectively. Here we provide a list of commercial and non-commercial panels and the limitations regarding the lack of harmonization in terms of terminology (i.e., categorization and measurement of traits) and reporting, the lack of genetic knowledge and environment influence to select markers and develop panels, and the debate surrounding the selection of genotyping technologies and prediction models and algorithms. In conclusion, this review aims to be an updated guide and to present an overview of the current related literature.
medicine, legal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is a comprehensive overview and technical limitations in the field of Forensic DNA Phenotyping (FDP). Specifically, through literature review, the paper aims to collect and discuss all existing SNP panels, genotyping techniques and prediction models used for FDP. The paper points out that although there has been an increasing amount of research on FDP in recent years, there is currently no comprehensive literature review to organize these studies and discuss the main technical limitations, such as inconsistent terminology (i.e., trait classification and measurement), lack of reporting standards, insufficient genetic knowledge, and the impact of environmental factors on the selection of markers and the development of panels. In addition, the paper also explores the controversies in the selection of genotyping techniques and prediction model algorithms. The main contribution of the paper lies in providing an updated guide, outlining the current literature related to FDP, especially for the inference of Biogeographical Ancestry (BGA) and Externally Visible Characteristics (EVC). Through this review, the author hopes to provide readers with a comprehensive perspective for further in - depth study of specific fields.