Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Objective</h3><p>This study aims to explore the current practice of risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews of behavioral clinical trials published in substance use journals and how assessment results were incorporated into meta-analysis.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Study Design and Setting</h3><p>The authors searched for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of behavioral interventions published from 2016 to 2020 in 40 substance use journals. Two authors independently screened and extracted relevant information from each article. Different tools for risk of bias assessment and approaches of incorporating the risk of bias assessment results into meta-analysis were summarized.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>The study identified 35 systematic reviews and meta-analyses of behavioral clinical trials. Among the 35 reviews, 31 (89%) assessed the risk of bias of their included studies. Twelve (39%) of the 31 reviews incorporated these assessment findings into their meta-analysis of intervention effects (e.g., conducted meta-regression or subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, limited the synthesis only to the "high quality" studies).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>Performing and reporting risk of bias assessment remain inconsistent in published systematic reviews. Future systematic reviews and meta-analyses are encouraged to connect their risk of bias assessment findings with meta-analysis and follow the most updated PRISMA guidelines in reporting the methods and results of risk of bias assessment.</p>

Risk of Bias Assessment: (1) Overview

Risk of Bias Assessment: (9) Application of the Risk of Bias Assessment Results

[Introduction on 'assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies' in Systematic Review of Health-Care Intervention Programs Revised by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality].

Risk of Bias Assessment: (8) Risk of Bias in Systematic Review (ROBIS)

Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research

Bias Risk Assessment: (3) Revised Cochrane Bias Risk Assessment Tool for Individual Randomized,cross-over Trials (Rob2.0)

[Risk on Bias Assessment: (2) Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Individually Randomized, Parallel Group Trials (Rob2.0)].

Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review

[Introduction of a Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Environmental Exposure (ROBINS-E)].

[Series of Risk of Bias Assessment (5): Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I)].

[Risk on Bias Assessment: (6) A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment on Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2)].

Tools to Assess Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Nursing Intervention in China: Global Implications of the Findings.

[Risk Related to Bias Assessment: (4) Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Cluster-Randomized Control Trials (Rob2.0)].

Assessing risk of bias in included studies

Risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of behavioral interventions for substance use outcomes

[Introduction of a Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Exposure (2022)].

Towards the automatic risk of bias assessment on randomized controlled trials: A comparison of RobotReviewer and humans

Methodological Quality (risk of Bias) Assessment Tools for Primary and Secondary Medical Studies: What Are They and Which is Better?

ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed

[Risk of Bias Assessment: (7) Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors].

Introduction of the Prediction Model Risk of Bias ASsessment Tool: a Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies