Abstract:The electron-impact excitation (EIE) cross-sections of 5s(2)S(1/2) -> 5p(2)P(3/2) of Cd+ have been calculated by using the relativistic distorted-wave (RDW) method which we have developed recently. In order to discuss the electronic correlation effects, four different models are used to describe the target wave functions, namely Model A, 8S, 5SD and 6SD. Model A is a single configuration model, it includes 5s(1/2), 5p(1/2) and 5p(3/2) only. The 8S is a valence-valence correlation model, it considers the impacts of 6s, 7s, 8s and 6p, 7p, 8p orbitals on wave function of 5s(1/2), 5p(3/2), respectively. The 5SD is a core-valence correlation model, it includes all the virtual single and double excitations from the 4s, 4p, 4d, 5s and 5p shells into the unoccupied 4f, 5p, 5d, and 5f shells. The 6SD is also a core-valence correlation model, it includes all the virtual single and double excitations from the 4s, 4p, 4d, 5s and 5p shells into the unoccupied 4f, 5p, 5d, 5f, 6s, 6p and 6d shells. The oscillator strength calculated by Model A is 0.72, which is in disagreement with the experiment 0.55 measured by Xu et al., while the results of 6SD 0.57 is in agreement with these of the experiment very well. For the EIE cross-sections, the core-valence correlation is very important. The results of Model A and 8S are larger than the experimental results obtained by Gomonai et al., while the results of 5SD and 6SD is obviously smaller than the results of Model A. In low energy range (<10 eV), the EIE cross-sections of 5SD and 6SD is at least 70% smaller than that of Model A and it is in good agreement with the experimental results. However, the contributions of correlation effects to the linear polarization of 5p(2)P(3/2) -> 5s(2)S(1/2) emission lines after excitation are very small, while the linear polarization of Model A, 5SD and 6SD are in consistent with each other and also in good agreement with other theories. But for high energies, the theoretical results have big difference from the experimental results obtained by Goto et al.

Dynamic effective charge in the continuum final state in the CDW-EIS model: ionisation of molecules by bare-ion impact

Dynamic effective charge in the target continuum within the CDW-EIS model for ionisation in ion–atom collisions: angular dependence

Importance Of The Electron Capture To The Continuum Mechanism In Heavy-Particle Collisions Of He2+ With C5+(1s)

Single differential electron impact ionization cross sections in the binary-encounter-Bethe approximation for the low binding energy regime

Post-Prior discrepancies in CDW-EIS calculations for ion impact ionization fully differential cross sections

Electron-impact Excitation of Ions Within a Quantum Plasma

Simple electron-impact excitation cross-sections including plasma density effects

Theoretical Study on Electron-Impact Excitation Cross Section and Polarization for 5s2s1/2 → 5p2p3/2 of Cd

Improved eikonal approach for charge exchange reactions at intermediate energies

A Dynamical (e,2e) Investigation into the Ionization of Pyrazine

Fully discrete model of kinetic ion-induced electron emission from metal surfaces

Ionization and excitation of bound electrons on atomic shells based on the Wave-Packet-Model dielectric function

Triple Differential Cross Sections for the Simultaneous Ionization and Excitation of He by Electron and Positron Impact

Recent Theoretical Progress in Treating Electron Impact Ionization of Molecules

Electron impact multiple ionization

Mixed, quantum-classical description of electron density transfer in the collision process

Experimental and Theoretical Cross Sections for Molecular-Frame Electron-Impact Excitation-Ionization of D-2

Theoretical triple differential cross sections for ionization of N 2 and CH 4 molecules by electron impact

Fully Differential Cross Sections for Electron-Impact Excitation-Ionization of Alignedd2

Electron and positron impact differential cross sections for the (e,2e) process on water molecule

Theoretical study on electron-impact excitation cross section and polarization for 5s(2)S(1/2) -> 5p(2)P(3/2) of Cd