Evaluating Pathologic Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Computer-Extracted Features from Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Videos.

Qi Zhang,Congcong Yuan,Wei Dai,Lei Tang,Jun Shi,Zuoyong Li,Man Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.06.023
IF: 3.119
2017-01-01
Physica Medica
Abstract:PurposeTo extract quantitative perfusion and texture features with computer assistance from contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) videos of breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and to evaluate pathologic response to NAC with these features.MethodsForty-two CEUS videos with 140,484 images were acquired from 21 breast cancer patients pre- and post-NAC. Time-intensity curve (TIC) features were calculated including the difference between area under TIC within a tumor and that within a computer-detected reference region (AUT_T-R). Four texture features were extracted including Homogeneity and Contrast. All patients were identified as pathologic responders by Miller and Payne criteria. The features between pre- and post-treatment in these responders were statistically compared, and the discrimination between pre- and post-treatment cancers was assessed with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.ResultsCompared with the pre-treatment cancers, the post-treatment cancers had significantly lower Homogeneity (p<0.001) and AUT_T-R (p=0.014), as well as higher Contrast (p<0.001), indicating the intratumoral contrast enhancement decreased and became more heterogeneous after NAC in responders. The combination of Homogeneity and AUT_T-R achieved an accuracy of 90.5% and area under ROC curve of 0.946 for discrimination between pre- and post-chemotherapy cancers without cross validation. The accuracy still reached as high as 85.7% under leave-one-out cross validation.ConclusionsThe computer-extracted CEUS features show reduced and more heterogeneous neovascularization of cancer after NAC. The features achieve high accuracy for discriminating between pre- and post-chemotherapy cancers in responders and thus are potentially valuable for tumor response evaluation in clinical practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?