Abstract:Background: Gastric cancer (GC) continues to be one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths globally. Diet significantly influences the incidence and progression of GC. However, the relationship between dietary intake and GC is inconsistent. Methods: A study was conducted with adults who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2003 to 2016 to investigate possible associations between 32 dietary factors and GC. To further detect potential causal relationships between these dietary factors and the risk of GC, a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was conducted. The primary method employed was the inverse variance weighted (IVW) analysis, and its results were further validated by four other methods. Results: Of the 35,098 participants surveyed, 20 had a history of GC. Based on the results of weighted logistic multivariate analysis, it was observed that there was a positive correlation between total fat intake [odds ratio (OR) = 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): (1.01–1.17), p = 0.03] and GC as well as negative association of dietary monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) intake [OR = 0.83, 95% CI: (0.76–0.92), p < 0.001]. Further evaluations of the odds of GC across the quartiles of dietary MUFAs showed that the top quartile of total MUFA intake was associated with a lower likelihood of GC in three different models [model1: OR = 0.03, 95% CI: (0.00–0.25), p < 0.01; model2: OR = 0.04, 95% CI: (0.00–0.38), p = 0.01; model3: OR = 0.04, 95% CI: (0.00–0.40), p = 0.01]. For the MR analyses, genetic instruments were selected from the IEU Open GWAS project; IVW analysis showed that GC risk was not associated with MUFAs [OR = 0.82, 95% CI: (0.59–1.14), p = 0.23] or the ratio of MUFAs to total fatty acids [OR = 1.00, 95% CI: (0.75–1.35), p = 0.98]. Similar results were observed when using the other MR methods. Conclusion: The NHANES study revealed that consuming MUFAs was linked to a lower risk of GC, although the results of MR analyses do not provide evidence of a causal relationship. Additional research is therefore necessary to clarify these findings.

Genetically Predicted High Body Mass Index is Associated with Increased Gastric Cancer Risk

Association of Body Mass Index and the Risk of Gastro-Esophageal Cancer: A Mendelian Randomization Study in a Japanese Population

Body mass index and esophageal and gastric cancer: A pooled analysis of 10 population-based cohort studies in Japan.

Body mass index and risk of gastric cancer: A 30-year follow-up study in the Linxian general population trial cohort.

Body Mass Index and the Risk of Gastric Cancer in Males: a Prospective Cohort Study

Quantitative Association Between Body Mass Index and the Risk of Cancer: A Global Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.

Association Between the Body Mass Index and Prostate Cancer at Biopsy is Modified by Genetic Risk

The association between BMI and gallbladder cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Body Mass Index and Risk of Female Reproductive System Tumors Subtypes: A Meta-Analysis Using Mendelian Randomization

Exposing the Causal Effect of Body Mass Index on the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Predictive model for risk of gastric cancer using genetic variants from genome-wide association studies and high-evidence meta-analysis

The causal relevance of body mass index in different histological types of lung cancer: A Mendelian randomization study

Body mass index and colorectal cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization study

An atlas on risk factors for gastrointestinal cancers: A systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies

Causal association of childhood obesity with cancer risk in adulthood: A Mendelian randomization study

Changes of Body Mass Index and Body Shape in Relation to Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Population-Based Case-Control Study

Genetically predicted childhood body mass index and lung cancer susceptibility: A two‐sample Mendelian randomization study

Associations of dietary factors with gastric cancer risk: insights from NHANES 2003–2016 and mendelian randomization analyses

Body Mass Index and Risk of Diabetic Nephropathy: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Obesity, Fat Distribution and Risk of Cancer in Women and Men: A Mendelian Randomisation Study

Body Mass Index and Cancer Risk: an Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies