Nuclear Masses and Mass Excess: Q values for Nuclear Reactions

Abstract:Note that implicit in eq. (1) is that the mass density of the nucleus is a constant (∼ 2.6×1014 g cm−3) and that the radius of the spherical nucleus is ∼1.2× 10−13 cm (= 1.2 fermi). The first term ((A−Z)mn +Z(mp +me)) is just the rest masses of the nucleons (and electrons), the second is the bulk nuclear term proportional to the number of nucleons in the nucleus, the third term is the bulk “surface tension” term proportional to the surface area of the nucleus, the fourth term is the “symmetry energy” term that is proportional to the neutron-proton asymmetry in the nucleus, the fifth term is the Coulomb term (∝ Z2e2/a), and the last term is the pairing term. This formula was originally inspired by the “liquid drop” model of the nucleus and is quite classical and empirical. The original theory of nuclear fission involved the relative values of the surface tension and Coulomb terms. It was determined that a nucleus would fission in twain if Z2/A was greater than roughly ∼45. For values of this fission parameter lower than ∼37, the mean time for spontaneous fission is longer than the age of the Universe. The difference between the atomic mass and the nuclear mass is the atomic binding energy of the electrons, plus the rest mass of the electron. Take care to determine which mass you use from tables in the literature. Generally, the binding energy of the electrons in the atom (∼eVs to keVs) are too small to compete with the nuclear terms (∼MeVs) and you needn’t worry, but for nuclei with the largest atomic numbers the atomic correction can be ∼50-100 keV. In a strong or electromagnetic nuclear reaction, since total nuclear charge is conserved, the Zme term in eq. (1) drops out when determining Q values. For a weak interaction, since the nuclear charge changes, the extra me must be accounted for explicitly.
Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?