Abstract:It has been increasingly recognized that entrepreneurship plays a crucial role in successful economies. The Schumpeterian approach to growth (Aghion and Howitt, 1997) advances the view that entrepreneurial dynamism is the key to innovation and growth. A growing body of policy work emphasizes the important role of entrepreneurs in economic development (World Bank, 2003). Yet, research on entrepreneurship in economics is rather limited. There are three distinct perspectives on entrepreneurship in social sciences. The first perspective focuses on the role of economic, political, and legal institutions in fostering or restricting entrepreneurship. Institutional problems are seen in credit constraints that make it impossible to borrow and set up businesses; insecurity of property rights that provides insufficient incentives for entrepreneurs; and regulatory burdens that make setting up new enterprises difficult. The second perspective focuses on the sociological variables shaping entrepreneurship. For example, sociologists study the role of values and social networks in promoting or discouraging entrepreneurial activities. Social networks may work through a variety of channels, such as family, friends, or ethnic groups. The third perspective emphasizes individual characteristics of entrepreneurs. Psychologists have studied the traits associated with entrepreneurship - such as a personal need for achievement, belief in the effect of personal effort on outcomes, attitudes towards risk, and individual self-confidence. Although there are studies on each perspective, little work looks at each of these factors taking the other into account. This is precisely what we do in this paper, using a new data set of Chinese entrepreneurs and a matching sample of non-entrepreneurs with similar age, gender and educational characteristics. The survey covers both entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs in order to understand how they differ in individual characteristics, family background, social networks, values and beliefs, and perceptions of the institutional environment. The data further allow us to separate Chinese entrepreneurs into two groups, by necessity and by opportunity, and to

Historical pathogen prevalence, collectivism, and different forms of entrepreneurship

Historical Prevalence of Infectious Diseases, Cultural Values, and the Origins of Economic Institutions

The Effect of Entrepreneurship on Economic Growth

Explaining Illness with Evil: Pathogen Prevalence Fosters Moral Vitalism

Pathogens shape human collective conceptual processing

Pathogen Stress Shapes Universal Human Collective Conceptual Changes in History

Direct and Indirect Implications of Pathogen Prevalence for Scientific and Technological Innovation

Role of Cultural Factors on Entrepreneurship Across the Diverse Economic Stages: Insights from GEM and GLOBE Data

Old habits die hard: pushing the frontiers of entrepreneurship persistence since 1926

Childhood adversity and the propensity for entrepreneurship: A quasi-experimental study of the Great Chinese Famine

Does a Sea Fishing Legacy Explain Differences in Risk Attitudes and Entrepreneurship?

Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations

The Effect of COVID-19 on College Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions

Entrepreneurial propensity in a transition economy: exploring micro‐level and meso‐level cultural antecedents

Who Are China's Entrepreneurs?

History Matters: the Effects of Chinese Ports from 170 Years Ago on Entrepreneurship Today

Entrepreneurial aspirations: economic development, inequalities and cultural values

Entrepreneurship and Community Culture: A Place-Based Study of Their Interdependency

Economic Inequality and Entrepreneurship: Micro Evidence from China

Air pollution and entrepreneurship: evidence from China

Environmental uncertainty and entrepreneurial orientation in collectivist and individualist cultures: evidence from Brazil and Belgium