Does the Diagnosis-Intervention Packet Payment Reform Impact Medical Costs, Quality, and Medical Service Capacity in Secondary and Tertiary Hospitals? A Difference-in-Differences Analysis Based on a Province in Northwest China
Jiali Teng,Qian Li,Guihang Song,Youli Han
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s467471
2024-09-01
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Abstract:Jiali Teng, 1 Qian Li, 1 Guihang Song, 2 Youli Han 1 1 School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Medical Services Management, Gansu Healthcare Security Administration, Lanzhou, Gansu, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Youli Han, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, 10 Xi Toutiao Road, Youanmenwai District, Beijing, People's Republic of China, 100069, Email Guihang Song, Department of Medical Services Management, Gansu Healthcare Security Administration, 101 Guangchangnan Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, Gansu, People's Republic of China, 730030, Email Purpose: To control medical costs and regulate the behavior of providers, China has formed an original widely piloted case-based payment under the regional global budget, called the Diagnosis-Intervention Packet (DIP). This study aimed to evaluated the impact of the DIP payment reform on medical costs, quality of care, and medical service capacity in a less-developed pilot city in Northwest China. Patients and Methods: We used the de-identified case-level discharge data of hospitalized patients from January 2021 to June 2022 in pilot and control cities located in the same province. We performed difference-in-differences (DID) analysis to examine the differential impact of the DIP reform for the entire sample and between secondary and tertiary hospitals. Results: The DIP payment reform resulted in a significant decrease of total expenditure per case in the entire sample (5.5%, P < 0.01) and tertiary hospitals (9.3%, P < 0.01). In-hospital mortality rate decreased significantly in tertiary hospitals (negligible in size, P < 0.05), as did all-cause readmission rate within 30 days in the entire sample (1.1 percentage points, P < 0.01) and secondary hospitals (1.4 percentage points, P < 0.01). Proportion of severe patients increased significantly in the entire sample (1.2 percentage points, P < 0.05) and tertiary hospitals (2.5 percentage points, P < 0.01). We did not find the DIP reform was associated with a significant change in relative weight per case. Conclusion: The DIP payment reform in the less-developed pilot city achieved short-term success in controlling medical costs without sacrificing the quality of care for the entire sample. Compared with secondary hospitals, tertiary hospitals experienced a greater decline in medical costs and received more severe patients. These findings hold lessons for less developed countries or areas to implement case-based payments and remind them of the variations between different levels of hospitals. Keywords: DIP payment, medical costs, quality of care, medical service capacity, less developed city, case-based payment Medical insurance payments are an important lever for regulating medical service behaviors and guiding the allocation of medical resources. To control the continuous growth in medical expenses, reform of health insurance payments in many countries has shifted from a retrospective payment system to a prospective payment system. 1–4 As a type of case-based payment, Diagnosis-related groups (DRG) payment has been widely adopted worldwide, and many countries, particularly low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), are increasingly using DRG payment to compensate health-service providers. 5 DRG payment divides patients into diverse diagnostic groups according to diagnosis, treatment, and patient characteristics and sets payment standards according to the group rather than the actual cost. China has long explored DRG payments, but owing to the high requirements regarding the quality of medical data, management, and technical capabilities of medical insurance personnel and hospitals, and the need to substantially reform the health information system, its application and implementation has been slow, especially in less developed areas. 6 To control medical costs, regulate the behavior of providers, and make it easier to implement, China has developed an original case-based payment method under the regional global budget based on the advantages of big data in several cities (eg, Guangzhou), called the Diagnosis-Intervention Packet (DIP). The main differences between the DIP and DRG payments are in the classification system and payment standard. The DRG classification system is based on the selection of clinical pathways and the subjective judgment of physicians, and the absolute reimbursements for each group in the general practice of DRG payment are fixed in advance. 7,8 Generally, the number of DRG groups does not exceed 1000. However, the DIP classification -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services,health policy & services