Abstract:Colonoscopy is considered the gold standard for colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention. It decreases the risk of developing CRC through detection and removal of precancerous colorectal lesions, adenomas, and serrated polyps. Since the implementation of screening programs, the incidence and mortality rates of CRC have decreased [1]. However, post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC), which is defined as CRC diagnosed after a colonoscopy and the scheduled surveillance colonoscopy, occurs in a significant number of patients. Risk factors for PCCRC include poor performance quality of the endoscopist, presence of high risk polyps at the index colonoscopy, increased patient age, and comorbidities of the patient [2] [3]. "The results of this study provide important evidence for consideration of personalized surveillance strategies for individuals with diverticular disease, independently of presence of colorectal polyps." Generally, the association between diverticular disease (respectively diverticulitis) and CRC is inconsistently discussed in the literature and has been an ongoing debate for years. Numerous studies have indicated that diverticular disease may be a risk factor for PCCRC based on the assumption that colonoscopy in patients with diverticular disease is technically more challenging and the assessment of the bowel mucosa might be restricted [4] [5]. In this issue of Endoscopy , Troelsen et al. present data on the risk of PCCRC in patients with diverticular disease compared with patients without diverticular disease who underwent mostly diagnostic colonoscopies within the Danish National Health Service Program [6]. The cohort study included 56 642 patients with and 306 800 without diverticular disease. Within a 3-year period after the index colonoscopy, the proportion of patients with CRC that was considered to be PCCRC was 6.5% for patients without diverticular disease, 19% for patients with diverticular disease overall, and 22% for PCCRC located in the proximal colon of patients with diverticular disease [6]. This study addresses an important topic both economically and from a healthcare point of view as diverticular disease is a common condition in the Western world. Nevertheless, presence of diverticular disease is not considered in current guidelines for CRC screening, even though it might be aligned with increased risk of CRC. The results of this study provide important evidence for consideration of personalized surveillance strategies for individuals with diverticular disease, independently of presence of colorectal polyps. The welcoming result of the present study is that PCCRC in patients with diverticular disease is rare, under 1%. However, a couple of features deserve further consideration. Regrettably, the study lacks data on key performance quality measures (i.e. adenoma detection rate, bowel cleansing quality, cecal intubation rate) [7]. This is particularly relevant as one of the main findings is the slightly higher rate of proximal PCCRC. Proximally located polyps are often sessile serrated lesions, the detection of which are especially dependent on adequate bowel cleansing and high competence of the endoscopists. Moreover, as discussed by the authors, colonoscopy performed in individuals with diverticular disease is technically more challenging and hence one could assume that the cecal intubation rate in those individuals might be lower, which could be a possible explanation for higher rates of proximal PCCRC. Another concern is the heterogeneity of the study cohort. This might bias the interpretation of the results. Patients with diverticular disease were older and had more comorbidities, which are factors associated with a higher risk of developing PCCRC (i.e. due to worse bowel preparation, technically more challenging endoscopies, and age being the strongest risk factor for the development of CRC). The authors were also unable to clearly distinguish between diverticular disease and diverticulitis, which is important because inflammation, particularly recurrent or chronic inflammation, is discussed as playing a key role in malignant disease. Finally, considering the results somehow challenge surveillance algorithms, the inclusion of individuals with hereditary cancer syndromes is debatable as they are recommended to follow specific surveillance algorithms. In summary, colonoscopy is definitely one of the great success stories in cancer prevention. Nevertheless, it still has its obstacles, which must be discussed. There is very strong evidence on how to decrease the risk of PCCRC in terms of performance quality and surveillance based on colonoscopy findings. Data on patient-related factors are comparably scarce. Therefore, the present study adds valuable evidence for individualized screening and surveillance recommendations based on patient characteristics. To implement specific recommendatio -Abstract Truncated-

Is histopathological analysis necessary in patients undergoing sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease? A retrospective study

Immunochemical characterization of two thyroid-stimulating hormone beta-subunit epitopes.

Risk factors for severe morbidity and definitive stoma after elective surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis: a multicenter national cohort study

Obstacle crossing in lower limb amputees.

A Review of EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces as Access Pathways for Individuals with Severe Disabilities

A Decade of Follow-Up to Assess the Risk of Recurrence and Surgery after a First Episode of Uncomplicated Left-Sided Diverticulitis

Is routine histopathological analysis of hemorrhoidectomy specimens necessary? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Comparing Laparoscopic Elective Sigmoid Resection With Conservative Treatment in Improving Quality of Life of Patients With Diverticulitis

Diverting ostomy prior to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer should be used selectively: A retrospective single-center cohort study

Stenosis of the colorectal anastomosis after surgery for diverticulitis: A national retrospective cohort study

Retrospective study on the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic surgery for complicated fistulizing diverticular disease in a high-volume colorectal center

Factors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease

[Laser Induced Fluorescence Spectroscopic Analysis of Aromatics from One Ring to Four Rings].

Colonoscopic findings in patients with pelvic floor dysfunction

A novel transthyretin mutation at position 30 (Leu for Val) associated with familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy.

Beyond the scope: diverticular disease and post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer

Accuracy of preoperative CT staging of acute colonic diverticulitis using the classification of diverticular disease (CDD) - Is there a beneficial impact of water enema and visceral obesity?

Diverticulosis, Adenomas, and Cancer in the Colon

Is proctoscopy sufficient for the evaluation of colorectal anastomosis prior to ileostomy reversal? A nationwide retrospective analysis of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative group (SICO‐CCN)

Coronary artery bypass grafting in hemodialysis-dependent patients: analysis of Japan Adult Cardiovascular Surgery Database.

Diverticulosis, Adenomas, and Cancer in the Colon: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Studies