Abstract:Pursuing intelligence is a long-term goal of the human, towards which two routes have been paved on the road: neuromorphic computing driven by neuroscience and machine learning driven by computer science (Pei et al., 2019). Spiking neural networks (SNNs) and neuromorphic chips (Basu et al., 2022;Christensen et al., 2022) dominate the neuromorphic computing domain, while artificial neural networks (ANNs) and machine learning accelerators (Deng et al., 2020) dominate the machine learning domain. Neuromorphic computing with efficient models and hardware has shown energy efficiency superiority (Renner et al., 2021), however, still lies in its infant stage and presents a gap in terms of accuracy and applications compared to the mature machine learning ecosystem.To this end, we proposed a Research Topic, named "Understanding and Bridging the Gap between Neuromorphic Computing and Machine Learning", in Frontiers in Neuroscience and Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience in 2019, and have successfully published 14 papers on neuromorphic computing and machine learning (Deng et al., 2021). Encouraged by such positive impetus for the neuromorphic computing community, we relaunched the Research Topic in 2022.This time, we have accepted 11 submissions in the end. The scope of these works covers neuromorphic models and algorithms, hardware implementation, and programming frameworks.SNNs encode information in spike events and process information using neural dynamics, which differ from ANNs. Due to the complicated spatiotemporal dynamics and non-differentiable spike activities, the SNN domain uses plasticitybased unsupervised learning algorithms (Diehl and Cook, 2015) for a long time but suffers from low accuracy. To break the bottleneck of lacking effective learning algorithms, the sophisticated backpropagation method in machine learning has Neuromorphic models enjoy low computational costs owing to the binary spike representation and sparse operations. However, directly executing SNNs on GPUs without tailored optimization is inefficient. Neuromorphic hardware is designed for the efficient execution of SNNs via event-driven computing (Merolla et al., 2014). The decentralized manycore architecture with high computing parallelism and memory locality is widely adopted by neuromorphic chips. However, its fragmented memories and decentralized execution lowers the resource utilization and processing efficiency. Wang et al., 2023 propose the mapping limit concept which points out the resource saving upper limit during logical and physical mapping when deploying neural networks onto neuromorphic chips. A closed-loop mapping strategy with an asynchronous 4D model partition for logical mapping and a Hamilton loop algorithm (HLA) for physical mapping are elaborated. Their methods and performance gains are validated on the TianjicX neuromorphic chip (Ma et al., 2022), which is helpful for building a general and efficient mapping framework for neuromorphic hardware.Software is one of the key components in the ecosystem of neuromorphic computing (Fang et al., 2023), which is sometimes more important than the hardware itself because it determines how much practical efficiency we can gain from the peak efficiency of hardware. In this Research Topic, we accepted one paper on the programming framework for neuromorphic models in this Research Neuromorphic computing is a neuroscience-driven domain in pursuing brain-like intelligence, which is an important route distinct from machine learning. Although neuromorphic systems have not yet demonstrated superior performance over machine learning systems in main stream intelligent tasks, we believe it can be significantly improved when the neuromorphic ecosystem is constructed and becomes iterative between algorithms, models, hardware, software, and benchmarks. This Research Topic is a quite minor step. We hope future works can really bridge the gap between neuromorphic computing and machine learning, along the way to reach the long-term goal of mimicking brain intelligence.

NEUTRAMS: Neural Network Transformation and Co-Design under Neuromorphic Hardware Constraints

Darwin:a Neuromorphic Hardware Co-Processor Based on Spiking Neural Networks

Bridge the Gap Between Neural Networks and Neuromorphic Hardware with a Neural Network Compiler

Bridging the Gap Between Neural Networks and Neuromorphic Hardware with A Neural Network Compiler

Design and Implementation of a Flexible Neuromorphic Computing System for Affective Communication Via Memristive Circuits

End-to-End Implementation of Various Hybrid Neural Networks on a Cross-Paradigm Neuromorphic Chip

A Co-Designed Neuromorphic Chip with Compact (17.9K F2) and Weak Neuron Number-Dependent Neuron/Synapse Modules

Hardware-friendly Neural Network Architecture for Neuromorphic Computing

Neural Network Transformation Under Hardware Constraints

Modular Building Blocks for Mapping Spiking Neural Networks Onto a Programmable Neuromorphic Processor

Design Space Exploration of Hardware Spiking Neurons for Embedded Artificial Intelligence

A Novel Neuromorphic Hardware Using Area-Efficient Chain RRAM-Based Synapses and Compact Neurons with (Anti-) Integration Scheme

UIC: A Unified and Scalable Chip Integrating Neuromorphic Computation and General Purpose Processor

Multicore Spiking Neuromorphic Chip in 180-nm with ReRAM Synapses and Digital Neurons

FangTianSim: High-Level Cycle-Accurate Resistive Random-Access Memory-Based Multi-Core Spiking Neural Network Processor Simulator

Core Processing Neuron‐enabled Circuit Motifs for Neuromorphic Computing

A Mapping Model of SNNs to Neuromorphic Hardware

A High Energy-Efficiency Multi-core Neuromorphic Architecture for Deep SNN Training

Compiling Spiking Neural Networks to Neuromorphic Hardware

Editorial: Understanding and bridging the gap between neuromorphic computing and machine learning, volume II

Bottom-Up and Top-Down Approaches for the Design of Neuromorphic Processing Systems: Tradeoffs and Synergies Between Natural and Artificial Intelligence