Abstract:Abstract Introduction The proliferation of wearable and smartphone technologies has enabled continuous monitoring of sleep using data from different channels (physiological [wearables], behavioural [phone usage] and ecological momentary assessment [EMA self-report]). As these modalities use different methods to assess sleep, information gaps suggested by discrepancies between estimates may be filled in through cross-referencing among the modalities to produce a more accurate sleep measurement. Moreover, the pattern of discrepancies could inform about specific sleep and peri-sleep behaviors (e.g. phone use before bedtime). Methods 198 staff and students from the National University of Singapore (61 male, mean age 26.15±5.83 years) were recruited for an 8-week study. Sleep timings were assessed daily from three modalities: a wearable sleep and activity tracker (Oura ring), estimations from smartphone touchscreen interactions (tappigraphy) and smartphone derived EMA self-reports. Sleep estimates from the different modalities were compared for agreement (bivariate correlation) and discrepancies (t-test). Additionally, clustering analysis of high-discrepancy nights (>1h discrepancy between modalities) was performed to identify pattens of sleep behaviors that could lead to specific discrepancies. Results Adherence throughout the 8-week monitoring period (total 11,088 nights) was = high for the Oura ring; 9826 nights [80%]), Tappigraphy; 9740 nights [88%)), and EMA; 9166 nights [83%]). Sleep estimates across the three modalities showed high agreement (r=0.79-.91), with some discrepancies: Relative to self-report data, Oura wake time tended to be a later (Mean diff=9mins, t=18.58, p<.001), while tappigraphy estimates of bedtime tended to be early (Mean diff=15mins, t=26.48, p<.001). On 23% of nights (1755 nights), however, large discrepancies were detected (>1h). K-means clustering identified three distinct patterns of discrepancy, which were dominantly expressed in different individuals. Group comparison revealed that these individuals differed in demographic variables (age, student/work status), sleep variables (sleep timing, duration, subjective sleepiness), and phone usage characteristics (overall and pre-bedtime phone usage). Conclusion These data show that the combined use of three streams of data concerning sleep is complementary. Moreover, discrepancy patterns provide specific insights into sleep and peri-sleep behaviors facilitating digital phenotyping. Support (if any) This research was supported by the National Medical Research Council Singapore (NMRC/STaR/015/2013 and NMRC/STaR19may-0001).

Sleepexplorer: A Visualization Tool to Make Sense of Correlations Between Personal Sleep Data and Contextual Factors

Designing Intelligent Sleep Analysis Systems for Automated Contextual Exploration on Personal Sleep-Tracking Data.

In Bed with Technology: Challenges and Opportunities for Sleep Tracking

SleepSense: A Noncontact and Cost-Effective Sleep Monitoring System

Co-design personal sleep health technology for and with university students

SleepGuard

Monitoring and Improving Personalized Sleep Quality from Long-Term Lifelogs

Correlation Visualisation for Sleep Data Analytics in SWAPP (sleep Wake Application)

Co-sleep: Designing a workplace-based wellness program for sleep deprivation

SleepSense: Non-invasive Sleep Event Recognition Using an Electromagnetic Probe

Will You Have a Good Sleep Tonight?: Sleep Quality Prediction with Mobile Phone

Is it Time to Include Wearable Sleep Trackers in the Applied Psychologists' Toolbox?

MS Pattern Explorer: interactive visual exploration of temporal activity patterns for multiple sclerosis

274 Multimodal longitudinal sleep tracking combining wearable, smartphone tap analysis and electronic questionnaires

The future of sleep health: a data-driven revolution in sleep science and medicine

A multidimensional investigation of sleep and biopsychosocial profiles with associated neural signatures

Mining Based Time-Series Sleeping Pattern Analysis for Life Big-Data

Context-Aware Behavioral Tips to Improve Sleep Quality via Machine Learning and Large Language Models

Trait-like nocturnal sleep behavior identified by combining wearable, phone-use, and self-report data

Wearable Sleep Technology in Clinical and Research Settings

Leveraging Zero-Effort Technology for Quantification of Sleep Quality Metrics