Comparative Study of Amide Proton Transfer‐Weighted Imaging and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Evaluation
Nan Meng,Xue‐Jia Wang,Jing Sun,Ling Huang,Zhe Wang,Kai‐Yu Wang,Jing Wang,Dong‐Ming Han,Mei‐Yun Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27190
IF: 4.4
2020-05-05
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:BackgroundAmide proton transfer‐weighted imaging (APTWI) and intravoxel incoherent motion imaging (IVIM) are valuable MRI techniques applied to cancer. PurposeTo compare APTWI and IVIM in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions and to evaluate the correlations between different parameters (MTRasym [3.5 ppm], D, D*, and f) and prognostic factors for breast cancer. Study TypeRetrospective. PopulationIn all, 123 breast lesions were studied before treatment, including 58 benign lesions and 65 malignant lesions. Field Strength/SequenceConventional MRI (T1WI, T2WI, and diffusion‐weighted imaging [DWI]), APTWI, and IVIM MRI at 3T. AssessmentThe magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry at 3.5 ppm (MTRasym [3.5 ppm]), diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo diffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f) values were compared between the benign and malignant groups and between groups with different expression levels of prognostic factors. Statistical TestsIndividual sample t‐test, χ2 test, Spearman correlation, logistic regression, and the Delong test. ResultsThe D and MTRasym (3.5 ppm) values of the malignant group were lower than those of the benign group; however, D* and f values were higher than those of the benign group (all P < 0.05). The areas under the curve (AUCs) of D, MTRasym (3.5 ppm), D*, and f were 0.809, 0.778, 0.670, and 0.766, respectively; however, only the difference between AUC (D) and AUC (D*) was significant (Z = 2.374, P < 0.05). The D value showed a low correlation with the pathological grade and Ki‐67 expression (| r | = 0.294, 0.367); the f value showed a low correlation with estrogen receptor (ER) expression (| r | = 0.382); and the MTRasym (3.5 ppm) value showed a low correlation with pathological grade (| r | = 0.371). Data ConclusionThis analysis revealed that both IVIM and APTWI could be used for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions, and APTWI‐derived MTRasym (3.5 ppm), IVIM‐derived D, D*, and f values showed correlations with some prognostic factors for breast cancer. Level of Evidence2 Technical Efficacy Stage2
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging