I. Psychology in relation to psychiatry
O. L. Zangwill
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700048467
IF: 10.592
1973-05-01
Psychological Medicine
Abstract:'Just as physiology is basic to physical medicine, so might psychology be considered the basic science of psychiatry.' This rather large claim was made by the writer of a leading article in a recent issue of the British MedicalJournal (1972) on the theme of research in psychiatry. As it poses something of a challenge, at all events to psychologists, it might seem to merit some examination. The question is not so much 'Is it true?' as 'Could it become true?' It is not, of course, the first time that such a claim has been made on behalf of psychology. Yet to the present-day psychiatrist, basic sciences such as biochemistry, pharmacology, and genetics might seem primafacie to have more immediate relevance to his subject. Once, indeed, the fashionable basic science was neuropathology, and to Wilhelm Griesinger and his disciples in mid-19th century Germany, mental disorders were but the expression of disease of the brain. Their slogan was Psychiatrie ohne Psychologic But it soon became apparent that not all diseases of the brain produce mental symptoms and not all mental symptoms are due to brain lesions. Hence the stage was set for a re-entry of psychology into the psychiatric world. When in time it came, the reaction to 'brain psychiatry' was, of course, altogether excessive. For Freud, there were only two sciences: psychology, pure and applied, and natural science. While conceding that the methods of science had served medicine—including parts of psychiatry—well, Freud had no doubt that the major issues of neurosis, and perhaps even of psychosis too, would find solution only through the applications of psychology. Indeed his slogan might well have been Psychiatrie ohne Neuropathologie. Since Freud's death, the limitations of psychoanalysis have become very apparent, though many of the ideas that emerged from his work continue to agitate psychiatric thought and to find application, pure or diluted, in the various brands of psychotherapy. To this extent, then, psychology of a kind is already basic to some areas of psychiatry and seems extremely likely to remain so. But it is plainly not psychoanalysis that the writer of the leading article referred to above has in mind. 'In recent years', he continues, 'psychology has made great advances in establishing a solid scientific foundation by rigorous experimentation.' It is, then, on behalf of experimental psychology (which, incidentally, Freud dismissed as trivial and irrelevant to clinical psychiatry) that he advances his claim. Before trying to assess its relevance, actual or potential, to progress in psychiatry, it is perhaps advisable to take a brief look at its origins, development, and present-day standing. As an academic discipline, experimental psychology was born in Germany about 100 years ago. Its midwives were G. T. Fechner, a physicist with a decided inclination towards philosophy and mysticism, H. von Helmholtz, the founder of modern sensory physiology, and W. Wundt, a physiologist who turned to psychology and established the first formal psychological laboratory at Leipzig in 1879. By and large, the aim of the new science was to develop quantitative techniques to throw light on the nature and course of conscious processes. Not surprisingly, its main successes lay in the fields of psychophysics and the special senses, in which it extended its already close links with sensory physiology. Its application to higher mental processes, such as memory or thinking, were somewhat less happy, largely due to a passionate and indeed at times almost comic dependence on introspection. None the less, Kraepelin, who had studied with Wundt, made some attempt to apply the methods of experimental psychology to issues in psychiatry, though it cannot be said that the outcome was particularly auspicious. To most clinical psychiatrists, the new 'brass instrument' psychology, as it was disparagingly called, was too arid, too fractional, and too academic to have effective application to psychiatric reality. Wundt's experimental psychology was imported to America by a number of his erstwhile students,