Abstract:Recently, the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) indicate a potential deviation from the standard $\Lambda$CDM model. Some studies suggest that the data points from the luminous red galaxies (LRG) survey in DESI BAO data may contribute to this discrepancy. In this work, our main goal is to investigate whether this deviation is caused by the parameterization of the equation of state (EoS) of dark energy (DE). Hence, we have examined four popular parameterized dark energy models in our analysis: the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL), Barboza-Alcaniz (BA), Jassal-Bagla-Padmanabhan (JBP), and Feng-Shen-Li-Li (FSLL) parameterizations. Considering that LRG1 and LRG2 data points may lead to deviation from the $\Lambda$CDM model, we use two versions of DESI BAO data, differing in whether these data points are included. Additionally, to break the parameter degeneracies and obtain robust constraint results, we introduce Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) and quasars (QSO) in our analysis. Our findings indicate that in these parameterizations, the deviation from ($w_0$,$w_{1}$)=(-1,0) becomes more pronounced when using the combined data from DESI BAO, SNe Ia, and QSO compilations. Here, $w_{0}$ and $w_{1}$ represent the EoS of DE. It suggests that the parameterizations of the EoS of DE have little impact on the deviation from the $\Lambda$CDM model. Besides, our analysis potentially hints that dark energy may have dynamic properties. In addition, the results obtained from different BAO datasets demonstrate that the LRG1 and LRG2 data points do indeed contribute to a deviation from the $\Lambda$CDM model. Finally, according to the statistical criteria, the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), the joint constraints provide substantial observational support to the BA and FSLL models.

Fitting the DESI BAO data with dark energy driven by the Cohen-Kaplan-Nelson bound

Fitting the DESI BAO Data with Dark Energy Driven by the Cohen-Kaplan-Nelson Bound

Dark energy in light of recent DESI BAO and Hubble tension

Revisiting holographic dark energy after DESI 2024

Cosmological constraints on dark energy models using DESI BAO 2024

DESI dark energy time evolution is recovered by cosmologically coupled black holes

DESI 2024: Constraints on Physics-Focused Aspects of Dark Energy using DESI DR1 BAO Data

Dynamical dark energy in the light of DESI 2024 data

Accelerated inference on accelerated cosmic expansion: New constraints on axion-like early dark energy with DESI BAO and ACT DR6 CMB lensing

Modified gravity interpretation of the evolving dark energy in light of DESI data

Uncorrelated estimations of $H_0$ redshift evolution from DESI baryon acoustic oscillation observations

Does dark energy really revive using DESI 2024 data?

Constraints on Interacting Dark Energy Models from the DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation and DES Supernovae Data

Interpreting DESI 2024 BAO: late-time dynamical dark energy or a local effect?

Dynamical Dark Energy Beyond Planck? Constraints from multiple CMB probes, DESI BAO and Type-Ia Supernovae

DESI and the Hubble tension in light of modified recombination

Investigating Late-Time Dark Energy and Massive Neutrinos in Light of DESI Y1 BAO

Constraints on Redshift-Binned Dark Energy using DESI BAO Data

Impact of LRG1 and LRG2 in DESI 2024 BAO data on dark energy evolution

Dark energy reconstructions combining BAO data with galaxy clusters and intermediate redshift catalogs