Profiling amyloid‐β peptides as biomarkers for cerebral amyloid angiopathy

Emma Berg,Iris Kersten,Gunnar Brinkmalm,Kjell Johansson,Anna M. Kort,Catharina J. M. Klijn,Floris H. B. M. Schreuder,Johan Gobom,Erik Stoops,Erik Portelius,Eleni Gkanatsiou,Henrik Zetterberg,Kaj Blennow,Hinke B. Kuiperij,Marcel M. Verbeek,Emma van den Berg,Anna M. de Kort
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.16074
2024-02-18
Journal of Neurochemistry
Abstract:We explored the biomarker potential of various amyloid‐β (Aβ) isoforms in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), quantified by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS–MS), to distinguish between cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. CSF levels of Aβ1‐34, Aβ1‐37, Aβ1‐38, Aβ1‐39, Aβ1‐40, and Aβ1‐42 were decreased in CAA compared with controls. Combining all Aβ peptides effectively differentiated CAA from subjects with an AD‐CSF profile (AD‐like; area under the curve 0.84). Notably, shorter Aβ peptides were specifically reduced in CAA, not in AD‐like subjects, suggesting distinct pathological mechanisms between vascular and parenchymal Aβ accumulation. This panel could enhance CAA diagnosis. Brain amyloid‐β (Aβ) deposits are key pathological hallmarks of both cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Microvascular deposits in CAA mainly consist of the Aβ40 peptide, whereas Aβ42 is the predominant variant in parenchymal plaques in AD. The relevance in pathogenesis and diagnostic accuracy of various other Aβ isoforms in CAA remain understudied. We aimed to investigate the biomarker potential of various Aβ isoforms in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to differentiate CAA from AD pathology. We included 25 patients with probable CAA, 50 subjects with a CSF profile indicative of AD pathology (AD‐like), and 23 age‐ and sex‐matched controls. CSF levels of Aβ1‐34, Aβ1‐37, Aβ1‐38, Aβ1‐39, Aβ1‐40, and Aβ1‐42 were quantified by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Lower CSF levels of all six Aβ peptides were observed in CAA patients compared with controls (p = 0.0005–0.03). Except for Aβ1‐42 (p = 1.0), all peptides were decreased in CAA compared with AD‐like subjects (p = 0.007–0.03). Besides Aβ1‐42, none of the Aβ peptides were decreased in AD‐like subjects compared with controls. All Aβ peptides combined differentiated CAA from AD‐like subjects better (area under the curve [AUC] 0.84) than individual peptide levels (AUC 0.51–0.75). Without Aβ1‐42 in the model (since decreased Aβ1‐42 served as AD‐like selection criterion), the AUC was 0.78 for distinguishing CAA from AD‐like subjects. CAA patients and AD‐like subjects showed distinct disease‐specific CSF Aβ profiles. Peptides shorter than Aβ1‐42 were decreased in CAA patients, but not AD‐like subjects, which could suggest different pathological mechanisms between vascular and parenchymal Aβ accumulation. This study supports the potential use of this panel of CSF Aβ peptides to indicate presence of CAA pathology with high accuracy.
biochemistry & molecular biology,neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?