The Nutrient Absorption-Transportation Hypothesis: Optimizing Structural Traits in Absorptive Roots.
Deliang Kong,Junjian Wang,Hui Zeng,Mengzhou Liu,Yuan Miao,Huifang Wu,Paul Kardol
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14344
IF: 9.4
2017-01-01
New Phytologist
Abstract:New PhytologistVolume 213, Issue 4 p. 1569-1572 LettersFree Access The nutrient absorption–transportation hypothesis: optimizing structural traits in absorptive roots Deliang Kong, Corresponding Author Deliang Kong [email protected] College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, 110866 China(Author for correspondence: tel +86 024 88492799; email [email protected])Search for more papers by this authorJunjian Wang, Junjian Wang Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, M1C 1A4 CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorHui Zeng, Hui Zeng Key Laboratory for Urban Habitat Environmental Science and Technology, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, 518005 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorMengzhou Liu, Mengzhou Liu School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYuan Miao, Yuan Miao School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorHuifang Wu, Huifang Wu School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorPaul Kardol, Paul Kardol Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, 90183 SwedenSearch for more papers by this author Deliang Kong, Corresponding Author Deliang Kong [email protected] College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, 110866 China(Author for correspondence: tel +86 024 88492799; email [email protected])Search for more papers by this authorJunjian Wang, Junjian Wang Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, M1C 1A4 CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorHui Zeng, Hui Zeng Key Laboratory for Urban Habitat Environmental Science and Technology, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, 518005 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorMengzhou Liu, Mengzhou Liu School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYuan Miao, Yuan Miao School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorHuifang Wu, Huifang Wu School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorPaul Kardol, Paul Kardol Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, 90183 SwedenSearch for more papers by this author First published: 15 November 2016 https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14344Citations: 73AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Introduction Plant anatomical structures are important for our understanding of plant ecology, evolution and responses to environmental change, such as shifts in temperature and precipitation regime. In absorptive roots, the cortex (i.e. the tissue between the epidermis and the endodermis) is used for resource absorption, while the stele is responsible for resource transportation (Guo et al., 2008). Absorptive roots with a thicker cortex can provide greater space for mycorrhizal colonization, and hence, a higher absorption rate through mycotrophy (Brundrett, 2002; Comas et al., 2012). However, absorptive roots with a larger stele usually have higher transportation capacity, as the stele can accommodate more and larger conduits (e.g. vessels or tracheids) for transportation. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that the size ratio of stele radius to cortex thickness is smaller in angiosperms than in gymnosperms (Guo et al., 2008) and that in angiosperms this ratio is larger for evolutionarily late diverged species than for early diverged species (Kong et al., 2014). This suggests that the diversification of the cortex to stele size ratio may also be an unappreciated physiological trait coinciding with shifts in the macroevolution of plant speciation. Recent studies have shown consistent allometric relationships for the cortex and stele in absorptive roots across a wide variety of species. Across a broad spectrum of angiosperm species, for example, in woody species in (sub)tropical (Kong et al., 2014), temperate (Gu et al., 2014) and mangrove ecosystems (D. L. Kong, unpublished data), as well as in some herbaceous species (Hummel et al., 2007) and ferns (Dong et al., 2015), the slope of the regression line between cortex thickness and root diameter is more than two-fold steeper than the slope of the regression line between stele radius and root diameter. These allometric relationships between cortex thickness and stele radius are remarkably strong and contribute greatly to a key ecological axis of absorptive roots, the root economics spectrum (RES; Kong et al., 2014; Weemstra et al., 2016). However, to date, we know little about what drives this allometric relationship. Here, we hypothesize that the allometric relationships arise from a functional balance between nutrient absorption and transportation. This hypothesis is posed by comparing two conceptual models of contrasting ratios of cortex to stele size describing the evolution of interspecific variation in absorptive root diameter. Through this comparison, we show that the model showing an increase in the cortex : stele ratio with increasing root diameter optimally balances nutrient absorption with transportation. We propose that optimizing the balance between these two key root functions may be a leading rule for assembling anatomical structures in absorptive roots. The nutrient absorption–transportation hypothesis can further our understanding of root economic strategies and plant adaptation to changing environments. Two alternative root models Recent studies have suggested that absorptive roots of woody angiosperms have evolved from thick to thin diameter over geological time (Comas et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2013). Given similar phylogenetical conservativeness of root cortex thickness and root diameter, and the strong correlation between these two traits (Kong et al., 2014), the early ancestor likely had similar root anatomy to the thick absorptive roots of the extant early diverged species, that is, thick roots with a large cortex thickness to stele radius ratio (Fig. 1). However, in providing a broader discussion platform for examining the evolutionary basis for the allometric relationship between root cortex and stele, we alternatively hypothesize the evolution of thick-rooted early diverged species with a small cortex thickness to stele radius ratio (Fig. 1). Hence, we present two contrasting models with diverging ratios of cortex thickness to stele radius (Fig. 1). In Model 1, the slope of the regression line of cortex thickness and root diameter is much less steep than the slope of the regression line of stele radius and root diameter (Fig. 1a). In this model, the allometric relationship leads to a smaller proportion of stele tissue in the root cross-sectional area with decreasing root thickness. Figure 1Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Conceptual model illustrating the allometric relationships between the size of root stele radius (black circle) and cortex thickness (grey-shaded ring) of absorptive roots in angiosperms as developed over evolutionary time. The red circles represent vessels in the stele. We present two alternative models for the evolution of absorptive root diameter showing how thick roots of a common early ancestor have diverged to thin roots of the extant late diverged species. Model 1 hypothesizes thick roots of the early diverged species with a thick stele, thin cortex and large vessels, while Model 2 depicts the extant early diverged species with a thin stele, thick cortex and small vessels. The panels show changes in (a, b) stele radius and cortex thickness, (c, d) number or diameter of vessels, and (e, f) mycorrhizal association (MA) and hydraulic conductance (Hc) with shifts in root diameter. By contrast, in Model 2, the slope of the regression line of cortex thickness and root diameter is much steeper than the slope of the regression line of stele radius and root diameter (Fig. 1b). Therefore, in this model the proportion of root cross-sectional area occupied by stele tissue increases with decreasing root thickness. Concurrent with the change in stele radius, the mean number and diameter of vessels in the stele are usually smaller in thinner roots (Kong et al., 2014). Consequently, the slope of the regression line of mean vessel number or diameter and root diameter is much steeper in Model 1 (Fig. 1c) than in Model 2 (Fig. 1d). Balancing nutrient absorption with transportation The diameter of absorptive roots often positively correlates with mycorrhizal colonization, a key pathway for nutrient acquisition (Comas et al., 2014; Kong et al., 2014; Eissenstat et al., 2015). In both models, it can be expected that mycorrhizal colonization is greater in thicker roots. However, for roots with a similar diameter, those with a higher proportion of cortex can facilitate higher mycorrhizal colonization intensity (i.e. the quantity of mycorrhizal fungi per unit of root cross-sectional area) (Brundrett, 2002; Comas et al., 2012; Valverde-Barrantes et al., 2016b). Therefore, at a similar root diameter, the roots in Model 2 with a thicker cortex (i.e. the grey lines in Fig. 1b vs 1a) would be expected to have greater mycorrhizal colonization than the roots in Model 1 (i.e. the grey lines in Fig. 1f vs 1e). When absorbed nutrients are transported to vessels, the volumetric flow rates are proportional to the fourth power of vessel diameter according to the Hagen–Poiseuille law (Feild & Arens, 2007). If vessel diameter varies at a similar rate to cortex thickness with root diameter, the fourth power relationship of nutrient transportation with vessel diameter could result in a remarkable ‘lag’ of nutrient absorption behind nutrient transportation. The reason is that even if the root cross-sectional area were to be completely occupied by the cortex, nutrient absorption through mycorrhizal associations could only be in a quadratic relationship with root diameter. Here, we assume that mycorrhizal colonization (y) is proportional to the root cortex cross-sectional area (x) (Brundrett, 2002; Comas et al., 2012), and that their relationship, as such, can be expressed as y = kx, where k is a constant. When the root cross-sectional area is completely occupied by the cortex, the earlier described relationship becomes: y = kπr2, where r is root radius. One effective way to reduce the nutrient absorption lag would be to widen the difference between the slope of cortex and stele size with root diameter, that is, a steeper slope of the regression line between cortex thickness and root diameter and a much less steep slope of the regression line between stele radius and root diameter (Fig. 1b). As indicated in Model 2, this could greatly enhance (or decrease) nutrient absorption with increasing (or decreasing) root diameter and constrain the drastic increase (or decrease) in nutrient transportation capacity based on the Hagen–Poiseuille law, thus more optimally balancing the two processes (Fig. 1f). By contrast, in Model 1, the greater increase (or decrease) of transportation capacity of vessels concurs with a much smaller increase (or decrease) of nutrient acquisition through mycorrhizal association (Fig. 1e). Thus, based on the Hagen–Poiseuille law and strong dependence on mycotrophy, we pose that the functional balance between nutrient absorption and transportation could be an important factor in explaining the widely demonstrated allometric relationship between the size of root stele and cortex in mycorrhizal woody angiosperms. Implications The nutrient absorption–transportation balance hypothesis may have important implications for our understanding of the ecology and evolution of woody angiosperms. In absorptive roots, the cortex constitutes a dominant component of hydraulic resistance of water transportation from the root surface to the vessels in the stele (Steudle & Peterson, 1998). Greater cortex thickness may bring greater hydraulic resistance through the cortex (Huang & Eissenstat, 2000). Hence, to ensure sufficient water transportation through the cortex to the vessels, species with a thicker root cortex should be mainly restricted to areas with ample water supply, such as rain forests (Baylis, 1975; Holdaway et al., 2011). However, species with a relatively thin cortex and, hence, lower hydraulic resistance through the cortex may have a competitive advantage in drier environments. Furthermore, recent studies using extant species have proposed that the evolution of absorptive roots in woody angiosperms from thick to thin (Fig. 1) could have resulted from the physiological drought caused by the decline in atmospheric CO2 during the Cretaceous (Comas et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2013; Gu et al., 2014). Producing thin and ephemeral roots has been suggested to be cost-effective in coping with periodic water stress (Chen et al., 2013). However, besides reducing root diameter, the allometric relationship between root cortex and stele size, as mentioned earlier, may also have driven plant adaptation to the progressively drier environment, that is, reduced cortex to stele ratio may be more favourable for water and nutrient transportation under dry conditions. Therefore, the nutrient absorption–transportation balance hypothesis adds further insights into the mechanisms of plant evolution and responses to climate change. Finally, the absorption–transportation balance hypothesis has consequences for the RES, which broadly depicts a tradeoff between resource acquisition and conservation (e.g. fast resource acquisition capacity and growth rates tradeoff with short root lifespan and reduced survival under stress conditions) (Reich, 2014; Weemstra et al., 2016). In our hypothesis, the relatively thick cortex in absorptive roots of early diverged species in Model 2 is primarily used to promote nutrient absorption for balancing nutrient transportation. However, the thicker cortex roots may be associated with greater nutrient acquisition through mycotrophy as well as a longer lifespan because of higher costs of root construction and maintenance of mycorrhizal associations (Liu et al., 2015, 2016; Weemstra et al., 2016). As such, the optimization of uptake of different limiting resources (i.e. water and nutrients) would lead to a weak, or lack of, RES in absorptive roots of woody angiosperms (Valverde-Barrantes et al., 2015; Kong et al., 2016; Weemstra et al., 2016). Hence, our hypothesis further emphasizes the impacts of mycorrhizal colonization on RES and contributes to the recently proposed multiple dimensions of root trait variation (Valverde-Barrantes et al., 2016a; Weemstra et al., 2016). The way forward The nutrient absorption–transportation hypothesis, as presented here, provides a stepping stone for future studies on root ecology and plant evolution. One of the main challenges is to determine how much plants with varying root anatomy benefit from mycorrhizal associations in terms of nutrient uptake, that is, the rate of nutrient absorption through mycorrhizal fungi. The nutrient flux through mycotrophy could be investigated by using stable isotope methods (Hodge & Fitter, 2009; Kiers et al., 2011), or quantum dots (Whiteside et al., 2012). Furthermore, along the lines of studies on leaf structure and anatomy by use of artificial leaves (Noblin et al., 2008), our hypothesis may also be tested by constructing artificial roots consisting of stele, vessels, cortex, and mycorrhizal fungi and monitoring nutrient absorption and transportation rates. Other experimental approaches may include testing physiological and competitive responses of phylogenetically divergent plant species varying in root cortex to stele ratio to factorial combinations of water and nutrient availability. Finally, we note that the allometric relationships for root anatomical structures are largely derived from arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM), woody angiosperms. It remains unclear whether similar allometric relationships exist in other plant lineages such as monocots (Hummel et al., 2007), gymnosperms (Guo et al., 2008), and ferns (Dong et al., 2015). Notably, gymnosperms and ferns transport water by means of tracheids (a primitive form of water-conducting conduits) which usually have lower hydraulic conductance than the vessels evolved in woody angiosperms (Esau, 1977). In addition, the relationships between root anatomical structures and mycorrhizal colonization can vary among mycorrhizal types (Brundrett, 2002; Comas et al., 2014) with, for example, stronger relationships for AM than for ectomycorrhizal (EM) species (Kong et al., 2014). Also, although experimental evidence is scarce, it has been suggested that the nutritional benefits of mycorrhizal associations may be higher for EM than for AM species (Ouimette et al., 2013). Therefore, testing our hypothesis across plant lineages and mycorrhizal types is important in unravelling drivers of the emerging multiple dimensions of trait variation in absorptive roots. This will eventually advance our understanding of the linkages between plant aboveground and belowground parts (Li et al., 2015; Valverde-Barrantes et al., 2015), plant evolution (Comas et al., 2012), species coexistence (Li et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2015) and responses to future climate change (Bardgett et al., 2014). Acknowledgements The authors thank Weibin Wang, Mingchao Liu and Chengen Ma for inspiring the idea of this study. The authors also appreciate two anonymous reviewers and the handling editor for their thoughtful comments. This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC grant nos. 31200344, 31670550) and Research Foundation for Introduced Talents by Shenyang Agricultural University. Author contributions D.K., J.W. and H.Z. conceived the idea for the study. D.K., Y.M., M.L. analysed data from the literature. D.K., J.W., Y.M., M.L., H.W., P.K. wrote the manuscript. References Bardgett RD, Mommer L, De Vries FT. 2014. Going underground: root traits as drivers of ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29: 692– 699. Baylis GTS. 1975. The magnolioid mycorrhiza and mycotrophy in root systems derived from it. In: FE Sanders, B Mosse, PB Tinker, eds. Endomycorrhizas. London, UK: Academic Press, 373– 389. Brundrett MC. 2002. Coevolution of roots and mycorrhizas of land plants. New Phytologist 154: 275– 304. Chen W, Zeng H, Eissenstat DM, Guo D. 2013. Variation of first-order root traits across climatic gradients and evolutionary trends in geological time. Global Ecology and Biogeography 22: 846– 856. Comas LH, Callahan HS, Midford PE. 2014. Patterns in root traits of woody species hosting arbuscular and ectomycorrhizas: implications for the evolution of belowground strategies. Ecology and Evolution 4: 2979– 2990. Comas LH, Mueller KE, Taylor LL, Midford PE, Callahan HS, Beerling DJ. 2012. Evolutionary patterns and biogeochemical significance of angiosperm root traits. International Journal of Plant Sciences 173: 584– 595. Dong X, Wang H, Gu J, Wang Y, Wang Z. 2015. Root morphology, histology and chemistry of nine fern species (pteridophyta) in a temperate forest. Plant and Soil 393: 215– 227. Eissenstat DM, Kucharski JM, Zadworny M, Adams TS, Koide RT. 2015. Linking root traits to nutrient foraging in arbuscular mycorrhizal trees in a temperate forest. New Phytologist 208: 114– 124. Esau K. 1977. Anatomy of seed plants. New York, NY, USA: Wiley & Sons. Feild TS, Arens NC. 2007. The ecophysiology of early angiosperms. Plant, Cell & Environment 30: 291– 309. Gu J, Xu Y, Dong X, Wang H, Wang Z. 2014. Root diameter variations explained by anatomy and phylogeny of 50 tropical and temperate tree species. Tree Physiology 34: 415– 425. Guo D, Xia M, Wei X, Chang W, Liu Y, Wang Z. 2008. Anatomical traits associated with absorption and mycorrhizal colonization are linked to root branch order in twenty-three Chinese temperate tree species. New Phytologist 180: 673– 683. Hodge A, Fitter AH. 2009. Substantial nitrogen acquisition by AM fungi from organic material has implications for N cycling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107: 13754– 13759. Holdaway RJ, Richardson SJ, Dickie IA, Peltzer DA, Coomes DA. 2011. Species- and community-level patterns in fine root traits along a 120 000-year soil chronosequence in temperate rain forest. Journal of Ecology 99: 954– 963. Huang B, Eissenstat DM. 2000. Linking hydraulic conductivity to anatomy in plants that vary in specific root length. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 125: 260– 264. Hummel I, Vile D, Violle C, Devaux J, Ricci B, Blanchard A, Garnier É, Roumet C. 2007. Relating root structure and anatomy to whole-plant functioning in 14 herbaceous Mediterranean species. New Phytologist 173: 313– 321. Kiers ET, Duhamel M, Beesetty Y, Mensah JA, Franken O, Verbruggen E, Fellbaum CR, Kowalchuk GA, Hart MM, Bago A et al. 2011. Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Science 333: 880– 882. Kong D, Ma C, Zhang Q, Li L, Chen X, Zeng H, Guo D. 2014. Leading dimensions in absorptive root trait variation across 96 subtropical forest species. New Phytologist 203: 863– 872. Kong D, Wang J, Kardol P, Wu H, Zeng H, Deng X, Deng Y. 2016. Economic strategies of plant absorptive roots vary with root diameter. Biogeosciences 13: 415– 424. Li L, McCormack ML, Ma C, Kong D, Zhang Q, Chen X, Zeng H, Niinemets Ü, Guo D. 2015. Leaf economics and hydraulic traits are decoupled in five species-rich tropical-subtropical forests. Ecology Letters 18: 899– 906. Liu B, He J, Zeng F, Lei J, Arndt SK. 2016. Life span and structure of ephemeral root modules of different functional groups from a desert system. New Phytologist 211: 103– 112. Liu B, Li H, Zhu B, Koide RT, Eissenstat DM, Guo D. 2015. Complementarity in nutrient foraging strategies of absorptive fine roots and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi across 14 coexisting subtropical tree species. New Phytologist 208: 125– 136. Noblin X, Mahadevan L, Coomaraswamy IA, Weitz DA, Holbrook NM, Zwieniecki MA. 2008. Optimal vein density in artificial and real leaves. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 9140– 9144. Ouimette A, Guo DL, Hobbie E, Gu J. 2013. Insights into root growth, function, and mycorrhizal abundance from chemical and isotopic data across root orders. Plant and Soil 367: 313– 326. Reich PB. 2014. The world-wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. Journal of Ecology 102: 275– 301. Steudle E, Peterson CA. 1998. How does water get through roots? Journal of Experimental Botany 49: 775– 788. Valverde-Barrantes OJ, Blackwood CB, Austin A. 2016a. Root traits are multidimensional: specific root length is independent from root tissue density and the plant economic spectrum: commentary on Kramer-Walter et al. (2016). Journal of Ecology 104: 1311– 1313. Valverde-Barrantes OJ, Horning AL, Smemo KA, Blackwood CB. 2016b. Phylogenetically structured traits in root systems influence arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization in woody angiosperms. Plant and Soil 404: 1– 12. Valverde-Barrantes OJ, Smemo KA, Blackwood CB, Norden N. 2015. Fine root morphology is phylogenetically structured, but nitrogen is related to the plant economics spectrum in temperate trees. Functional Ecology 29: 796– 807. Weemstra M, Mommer L, Visser EJ, van Ruijven J, Kuyper TW, Mohren GM, Sterck FJ. 2016. Towards a multidimensional root trait framework: a tree root review. New Phytologist 211: 1159– 1169. Whiteside MD, Digman MA, Gratton E, Treseder KK. 2012. Organic nitrogen uptake by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a boreal forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 55: 7– 13. Citing Literature Volume213, Issue4March 2017Pages 1569-1572 This article also appears in:Root traits FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation