Comparison Of Outcomes After Umbilical Cord Blood And Unmanipulated Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation In Children With High-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Mo Xiao-Dong,Tang Bao-Lin,Zhang Xiao-Hui,Zheng Chang-Cheng,Xu Lan-Ping,Zhu Xiao-Yu,Wang Yu,Liu Hui-Lan,Yan Chen-Hua,Chu Xian-Deng,Chen Huan,Geng Liang-Quan,Liu Kai-Yan,Sun Zi-Min,Huang Xiao-Jun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30249
2016-01-01
International Journal of Cancer
Abstract:Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an effective therapy for children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) or umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) are both important alternative sources of stem cells for those without an HLA-identical sibling donor or unrelated matched donor. We aimed to compare the therapeutic effects of single UCBT and unmanipulated haplo-HSCT in high-risk ALL children (n=129). Hematopoietic recovery was significantly faster in haplo-HSCT recipients than in UCBT recipients. The 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse in the haplo-HSCT and UCBT groups were 16.1% and 24.1%, respectively (p=0.169). The 2-year cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality in the haplo-HSCT and UCBT groups were 12.8% and 18.8%, respectively (p=0.277). The 2-year probabilities of overall survival in the haplo-HSCT and UCBT groups were 82.0% and 69.6%, respectively (p=0.071), and the 2-year probability of disease-free survival in the haplo-HSCT group was higher than in the UCBT group (71.0% vs. 57.2%, p=0.040). However, several variables (such as leukocyte count and cytogenetics at diagnosis) were different between the groups, and a possible center effect should also be considered. In addition, only mild and moderate chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was associated with significantly improved survival compared to those without chronic GVHD in multivariate analysis. Thus, our results show that both unmanipulated haplo-HSCT and UCBT are valid for high-risk ALL children lacking a HLA matched donor, and both strategies expand the donor pool for children in need.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?