Abstract:AbstractMany Chinese cities are becoming more polycentric during the last decade of rapid urban expansion. In this study, we attempt to explore the relationship between travel behaviour and polycentric built environment for both work and non‐work trips by multiple multinomial logit mode choice models for work and non‐work travel. The choice set is comprised of: driving a private car, taking the bus and taking the subway. The empirical analysis in this paper is based on the 2005 Shenzhen Personal Travel Survey. The model specifications tested a set of variables describing trip mode attributes, household socio‐demographics, and polycentric centre types such as regional centres, district centres, district subcentres and suburbs. The results indicate that urban form is an important factor in affecting mode choice: people living or working in a regional city centre are more likely to take public transportation, compared to those living in subcentres and suburbs. The results also imply that people perceive a higher influence of built environment on mode choice for work trips than non‐work trips. These research findings support the contention that different types of urban centres can meaningfully influence how residents travel, even after controlling for socio‐economic characteristics.Resumen. Muchas ciudades chinas han estado haciéndose cada vez más policéntricas durante la rápida expansión de la última década. En este estudio, intentamos explorar la relación entre el comportamiento respecto al transporte urbano y los entornos policéntricos en relación con los desplazamientos por motivos laborales y no laborales, empleando modelos de selección de modo logit multinomial múltiple para desplazamientos laborales y no laborales. El abanico de elección se compone de: utilizar el propio vehículo, tomar el autobús y tomar el metro. El análisis empírico de este artículo se basa en la Encuesta Personal de Transporte en Shenzen de 2005. Las especificaciones del modelo han experimentado con un conjunto de variables que describen atributos del modo de viajar, la socio‐demografía de los hogares, y los diferentes tipos de centros policéntricos, como pueden ser centros regionales, de distrito, subcentros de distrito y suburbios. Los resultados indican que la configuración urbana es un factor importante que afecta el modo de selección: es más probable que las personas que viven o trabajan en un centro de ciudad regional usen el transporte público, en comparación con las que viven en subcentros y en los suburbios. Los resultados implican asimismo que las personas perciben una mayor influencia del entorno urbano al seleccionar el modo de desplazamiento al trabajo en comparación con los desplazamientos no laborales. Estos hallazgos apoyan el argumento de que los diferentes tipos de centros urbanos pueden influir poderosamente en el modo de desplazamiento de los residentes, incluso después de controlar las características socioeconómicas.graphic

Does it matter if you like it? exploring the relationship between travel mode choice, preference, and satisfaction

Examining the roles of transport captivity and travel dissonance in travel satisfaction

Using modality styles to understand cycling dissonance: The role of the street-scale environment in commuters' travel mode choice

Do satisfying walking and cycling trips result in more future trips with active travel modes? An exploratory study

Disentangling the behavioural side of the first and last mile problem: the role of modality style and the built environment

Understanding the role of household modality style on first and last mile travel mode choice and public transit station choice

From attitude to satisfaction: introducing the travel mode choice cycle

Polycentric Spatial Structure and Travel Mode Choice: the Case of Shenzhen, China

Satisfaction-induced travel: Do satisfying trips trigger more shared micro-mobility use?

A new approach to travel information sources and travel behaviour based on cognitive dissonance theory

Travel mode attitudes, urban context, and demographics: do they interact differently for bicycle commuting and cycling for other purposes?

How do workers respond to dissatisfaction with commuting and work? Insights from a panel survey in Luxembourg

Travel satisfaction inequality and the role of the urban metro system

A joint analysis of accessibility and household trip frequencies by travel mode

The Impacts of the Multiscale Built Environment on Commuting Mode Choice: Spatial Heterogeneity, Moderating Effects, and Implications for Demand Estimation

Understanding the Determinants of Travel Mode Choice of Residents and Its Carbon Mitigation Potential

Discrete-continuous Model of Selections on Commuters' Travel Modes and Trip Timings

Investigating work commuters mode choice behavior in Dalian city during pandemic: a hybrid choice model approach

Multimodal travel-based multitasking during the commute: Who does what?

Does mental health influence commuters' mode choice? A cross-sectional assessment from the Netherlands

Understanding Multimodal Behavior: Individual Modality Styles and Their Influence on Travel Behavior