Comparative Analysis of Image Classification Methods for Automatic Diagnosis of Ophthalmic Images.

Liming Wang,Kai Zhang,Xiyang Liu,Erping Long,Jiewei Jiang,Yingying An,Jia Zhang,Zhenzhen Liu,Zhuoling Lin,Xiaoyan Li,Jingjing Chen,Qianzhong Cao,Jing Li,Xiaohang Wu,Dongni Wang,Wangting Li,Haotian Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41545
IF: 4.6
2017-01-01
Scientific Reports
Abstract:There are many image classification methods, but it remains unclear which methods are most helpful for analyzing and intelligently identifying ophthalmic images. We select representative slit-lamp images which show the complexity of ocular images as research material to compare image classification algorithms for diagnosing ophthalmic diseases. To facilitate this study, some feature extraction algorithms and classifiers are combined to automatic diagnose pediatric cataract with same dataset and then their performance are compared using multiple criteria. This comparative study reveals the general characteristics of the existing methods for automatic identification of ophthalmic images and provides new insights into the strengths and shortcomings of these methods. The relevant methods (local binary pattern +SVMs, wavelet transformation +SVMs) which achieve an average accuracy of 87% and can be adopted in specific situations to aid doctors in preliminarily disease screening. Furthermore, some methods requiring fewer computational resources and less time could be applied in remote places or mobile devices to assist individuals in understanding the condition of their body. In addition, it would be helpful to accelerate the development of innovative approaches and to apply these methods to assist doctors in diagnosing ophthalmic disease.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?