Abstract:Background: The Draft Mental Health Bill proposes removal of both intellectual disability and autism from Section 3 of the Mental Health Act for England and Wales (MHA). This would lead to people with intellectual disability (PwID) and/or autism could not be detained beyond 28 days, in the absence of diagnosed co-occurring mental illness. Aim: To obtain views of psychiatrists working with PwID in England and Wales regarding the proposed MHA changes. This study focusses specifically on the impact on PwID. Methods: A cross-sectional online mixed methodology survey of Likert and free-text response questions was developed, to ascertain perceptions of proposed legislative changes to the MHA. A non-discriminatory exponential snowballing technique leading to non-probability sampling was used to disseminate the survey. Quantitative data was analysed using descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney and Fisher's exact tests. Thematic analysis was conducted on free text responses. Results: A total of 82 psychiatrists (33%) from approximately 250 eligible completed the survey. Nearly two-thirds (64%) reported good awareness of the proposed changes, with over half (55%) reporting disagreement with the changes. Psychiatrists working in inpatient settings for PwID reported increased awareness of the changes, less agreement with the reforms, and increased expectations of the reforms having negative unintended consequences, compared to their peers working exclusively in the community. Consultants reported greater disagreement with the changes compared to their non-consultant peers. Qualitative analysis identified five main themes: impact on diagnosis and treatment, seeking alternative options, introducing inequities, resources, and meeting holistic care goals through the Care, Education and Treatment Reviews (CETR) process. Conclusion: Psychiatrists working with PwID report widespread disagreement with the proposed changes to the MHA for PwID, with greater levels of disagreement among those working in inpatient services. Caution with respect to the proposed changes, and monitoring of the impact of the changes if implemented, is advised.

The response of the secretary of state and the "supervised discharge" provision of the UK mental health bill 2022: Potential problems and opportunities in the wake of Secretary of State for Justice v MM [2018] UKSC 60

The compulsory psychiatric regime in Hong Kong: Constitutional and ethical perspectives

Ireland's Mental Health Bill 2024: progress, problems and Procrustean perils

The Abolition of 'Discharge By Operation of Law' – patients detained under sections 3 and 37, Mental Health Act 1983

The CRPD and mental health law reform in Scotland

Severe personality disorder, treatment engagement and the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012: what you need to know

Multi-level protection of rights: India's Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 and the United Nations' Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Articles 12 and 14)

Federal and Provincial Responsibilities to Implement Physician-Assisted Suicide

Imprisonment following discharge from mental health units: A developing trend in New Zealand

THE OFFENDER PERSONALITY DISORDER PATHWAY: RISKING REHABILITATION?

Regulating Risk and Autonomy in Assisted Suicide: Conway V Secretary of State for Justice

Mental Health Bill promises more tailored and dignified treatment for people detained

A review of the new provisions for sanctioning mentally disordered offenders in China, in a broader historical context

(Un)blurred lines? Sex, disability, and the dynamic boundaries of mental capacity law

Debate: Involuntary treatment and detention are a necessary part of mental health care for children and young people – a perspective from an Independent Advocate in England, United Kingdom

Crime, punishment, and detention in secure psychiatric hospital

Conditionally discharged restricted patients and the need for long-term medium security

The views of psychiatrists on proposed changes to the England and Wales Mental Health Act 1983 legislation for people with intellectual disability: A national study

"It's doom alone that counts": can international human rights law be an effective source of rights in correctional conditions litigation?

Application of the Paternalism Principle to Constitutional Rights: Mental Health Case-Law in Ireland

Long-term segregation and seclusion for people with an intellectual disability and/or autism in hospitals: critique of the current state of affairs