Abstract:Objective It is important to determine whether the use of different quality improvement tools in neonatal resuscitation is well-received by health care teams and improves coordination and perceived quality of the stabilization of the newborn at birth. This study aimed to explore the satisfaction of personnel involved in resuscitation for infants under 32 weeks of gestational age (<32 wGA) at birth with the use of an assistance toolkit: Random Real-time Safety Audits (RRSA) of neonatal stabilization stations, the use of pre-resuscitation checklists, and the implementation of briefings and debriefings. Study Design A quasi-experimental, prospective, multicenter intervention study was conducted in five level III-A neonatal intensive care units in Madrid (Spain). The intervention involved conducting weekly RRSA of neonatal resuscitation stations and the systematic use of checklists, briefings, and debriefings during stabilization at birth for infants <32 wGA. The satisfaction with their use was analyzed through surveys conducted with the personnel responsible for resuscitating these newborns. These surveys were conducted both before and after the intervention phase (each lasting 1 year) and used a Likert scale response model to assess various aspects of the utility of the introduced assistance tools, team coordination, and perceived quality of the resuscitation. Results Comparison of data from 200 preintervention surveys and 155 postintervention surveys revealed statistically significant differences ( p < 0.001) between the two phases. The postintervention phase scored higher in all aspects related to the effective utilization of these tools. Improvements were observed in team coordination and the perceived quality of neonatal resuscitation. These improved scores were consistent across personnel roles and years of experience. Conclusion Personnel attending to infants <32 wGA in the delivery room are satisfied with the application of RRSA, checklists, briefings, and debriefings in the neonatal resuscitation and perceive a higher level of quality in the stabilization of these newborns following the introduction of these tools. Key Points RRSA, checklists, briefings, and debriefings improve the quality of neonatal resuscitation at birth. These tools, when used together, are well-received and enhance perceived resuscitation quality. Perception of utility and quality improvement is consistent across roles and experience. Received: 26 September 2023 Accepted: 04 January 2024 Accepted Manuscript online: 08 January 2024 Article published online: 30 January 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

Assessment of severity and avoidability of adverse drug reactions in neonates: a reproducibility study of the Hartwig tool and LAAT

Challenges in the assessment of adverse drug reactions in children and neonates

The neonatal adverse event severity scale: current status, a stakeholders' assessment, and future perspectives

Drug related adverse event assessment in neonates in clinical trials and clinical care

Adverse drug reactions in neonates: a brief analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system

Development and application of a primer and reference assessment tool for neonatal abstinence syndrome: A phase I pilot study

Instrument for classifying dependency in neonatal intensive care: analysis of agreement and reliability

Determining Interrater Reliability of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium Screening Tool Among PICU Nurses

Neonatal acuity tool-defined staffing ratios in a tertiary Australian neonatal intensive care unit

What is the Opinion of the Health Care Personnel Regarding the Use of Different Assistive Tools to Improve the Quality of Neonatal Resuscitation?

Development, Testing, and Findings of a Pediatric-Focused Trigger Tool to Identify Medication-Related Harm in US Children's Hospitals

Multicentre external validation of the Neonatal Healthcare-associated infectiOn Prediction (NeoHoP) score: a retrospective case-control study

Prevalence, Causes and Severity of Medication Administration Errors in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Voluntary Neonatal Medication Incident Reporting—A Single Centre Retrospective Analysis

Pharmacovigilance of nephrotoxic drugs in neonates: the Pottel method for acute kidney injury detection in ELBW neonates

Comparison of Proposed National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Panel Recommendations with Newborn Sepsis Risk Calculator in Term Neonates Exposed to Maternal Chorioamnionitis.

Validity and reliability of the Perineal Assessment Tool

The Use of a Single Risk Assessment Tool for Mortality and Numerous Hospital-Acquired Conditions

Inter-Rater Reliability Between Critical Care Nurses Performing a Pediatric Modification to the Glasgow Coma Scale

Identifying neonates at risk for post-discharge mortality in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Monrovia, Liberia: Derivation and internal validation of a novel risk assessment tool

Smart pumps and random safety audits in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: a new challenge for patient safety