Charge-specific adverse effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on zebrafish (Danio rerio) development and behavior

Miaomiao Teng,Xiaoli Zhao,Fengchang Wu,Chengju Wang,Chen Wang,Jason C White,Wentian Zhao,Lingfeng Zhou,Sen Yan,Sinuo Tian,Jason C. White
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107154
IF: 11.8
2022-05-01
Environment International
Abstract:Nanoplastics are being detected with increasing frequency in aquatic environments. Although evidence suggests that nanoplastics can cause overt toxicity to biota across different trophic levels, but there is little understanding of how materials such as differently charged polystyrene nanoplastics (PS-NP) impact fish development and behavior. Following exposure to amino-modified (positive charge) PS-NP, fluorescence accumulation was observed in the zebrafish brain and gastrointestinal tract. Positively charged PS-NP induced stronger developmental toxicity (decreased spontaneous movement, heartbeat, hatching rate, and length) and cell apoptosis in the brain and induced greater neurobehavioral impairment as compared to carboxyl-modified (negative charge) PS-NP. These findings correlated well with fluorescence differences indicating PS-NP presence. Targeted neuro-metabolite analysis by UHPLC-MS/MS reveals that positively charged PS-NP decreased levels of glycine, cysteine, glutathione, and glutamic acid, while the increased levels of spermine, spermidine, and tyramine were induced by negatively charged PS-NP. Positively charged PS-NP interacted with the neurotransmitter receptor N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor 2B (NMDA2B), whereas negatively charged PS-NP impacted the G-protein-coupled receptor 1 (GPR1), each with different binding energies that led to behavioral differences. These findings reveal the charge-specific toxicity of nanoplastics to fish and provide new perspective for understanding PS-NP neurotoxicity that is needed to accurately assess potential environmental and health risks of these emerging contaminants.
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?