Making k-Object-Sensitive Pointer Analysis More Precise with Still k-Limiting.

Tian Tan,Yue Li,Jingling Xue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53413-7_24

2016-01-01

Abstract:Object-sensitivity is regarded as arguably the best context abstraction for pointer analysis in object-oriented languages. However, a k-object-sensitive pointer analysis, which uses a sequence of k allocation sites (as k context elements) to represent a calling context of a method call, may end up using some context elements redundantly without inducing a finer partition of the space of (concrete) calling contexts for the method call. In this paper, we introduce Bean, a general approach for improving the precision of any k-object-sensitive analysis, denoted k-obj, by still using a k-limiting context abstraction. The novelty is to identify allocation sites that are redundant context elements in k-obj from an Object Allocation Graph (OAG), which is built based on a pre-analysis (e.g., a context-insensitive Andersen's analysis) performed initially on a program and then avoid them in the subsequent k-object-sensitive analysis for the program. Bean is generally more precise than k-obj, with a precision that is guaranteed to be as good as k-obj in the worst case. We have implemented Bean as an open-source tool and applied it to refine two state-of-the-art whole-program pointer analyses in Doop. For two representative clients (may-alias and may-fail-cast) evaluated on a set of nine large Java programs from the DaCapo benchmark suite, Bean has succeeded in making both analyses more precise for all these benchmarks under each client at only small increases in analysis cost.