Abstract:Computer vision technologies have been applied to an increasingly wide range of applications from autonomous car navigation, to medical image analysis, to precision agriculture. Despite many of these exciting innovations, recent studies reveal a number of risks in using existing computer vision systems, suggesting results of such systems may be unfair or untrustworthy. For example, major commercial facial analysis tools were shown to have substantial accuracy disparities for people of different gender or with different skin colors (Buolamwini and Gebru 2018). Visual semantic role labeling models were found to exhibit societal biases and stereotypes (Zhao et al. 2017) such as frequently associating certain activity labels with specific gender (e.g., associate “cooking” with woman). Even worse, seemly accurate image classifiers may in fact made the predictions by picking up spurious correlations between objects and irrelevant background information rather than identifying meaningful features of the objects (Ribeiro, Singh, and Guestrin 2016). Many of the risks embedded in modern computer vision systems can be attributed to the use of a training dataset that is biased. Indeed, the computer vision community has long recognized that many visual datasets present varying degrees of build-in bias due to factors such as photographic style of photographers and selection from dataset curators (Torralba, Efros, and others 2011). Using these biased datasets to train machine learning models for addressing different computer vision tasks naturally leads to the phenomenon of “bias in, bias out” and results in undesirable performance. Thus, to mitigate the fairness, accountability, and transparency concerns in computer vision, a crucial step is to start the entire pipeline with high-quality visual datasets that, at least, are authentic representations of the visual world. In other words, being able to detect potential biases hidden in the datasets prior to model development is a key step in guarding against unfair or untrustworthy outcomes in computer vision. While a few techniques have been developed to automatically detect dataset biases (Tramer et al. 2017), the nonstructured nature of visual data makes bias discovery in image datasets particularly challenging. This is because no human-comprehensive attributes can be directly leveraged

A Domain Robust Approach for Image Dataset Construction.

Exploiting Web Images for Dataset Construction: A Domain Robust Approach

Towards Automatic Construction of Diverse, High-Quality Image Datasets

Towards Automatic Construction of Diverse, High-quality Image Dataset

Automatic Image Dataset Construction with Multiple Textual Metadata

A New Web-Supervised Method for Image Dataset Constructions

A New Framework for Image Dataset Construction with Web Images

Discovering Biases in Image Datasets with the Crowd

Domain Adaptation on Point Clouds Via Geometry-Aware Implicits

One Network for Multi-Domains: Domain Adaptive Hashing with Intersectant Generative Adversarial Networks.

An Adversarial Domain Adaptation Network for Cross-Domain Fine-Grained Recognition

CDTD: A Large-Scale Cross-Domain Benchmark for Instance-Level Image-to-Image Translation and Domain Adaptive Object Detection.

Benchmarking Multi-Domain Active Learning on Image Classification

Multitarget Domain Adaptation Building Instance Extraction of Remote Sensing Imagery With Domain-Common Approximation Learning

Domaindiff: Boost out-of-Distribution Generalization with Synthetic Data.

Crossing the Gap: Domain Generalization for Image Captioning

Unsupervised Multi-Domain Image Translation with Domain-Specific Encoders/Decoders

Automatic Image Dataset Construction from Click-through Logs Using Deep Neural Network

Fully Unsupervised Domain-Agnostic Image Retrieval

DomainVerse: A Benchmark Towards Real-World Distribution Shifts For Tuning-Free Adaptive Domain Generalization

Domain Expansion via Network Adaptation for Solving Inverse Problems