Abstract:BackgroundProtein sites evolve at different rates due to functional and biophysical constraints. It is usually considered that the main structural determinant of a site’s rate of evolution is its Relative Solvent Accessibility (RSA). However, a recent comparative study has shown that the main structural determinant is the site’s Local Packing Density (LPD). LPD is related with dynamical flexibility, which has also been shown to correlate with sequence variability. Our purpose is to investigate the mechanism that connects a site’s LPD with its rate of evolution.ResultsWe consider two models: an empirical Flexibility Model and a mechanistic Stress Model. The Flexibility Model postulates a linear increase of site-specific rate of evolution with dynamical flexibility. The Stress Model, introduced here, models mutations as random perturbations of the protein’s potential energy landscape, for which we use simple Elastic Network Models (ENMs). To account for natural selection we assume a single active conformation and use basic statistical physics to derive a linear relationship between site-specific evolutionary rates and the local stress of the mutant’s active conformation.We compare both models on a large and diverse dataset of enzymes. In a protein-by-protein study we found that the Stress Model outperforms the Flexibility Model for most proteins. Pooling all proteins together we show that the Stress Model is strongly supported by the total weight of evidence. Moreover, it accounts for the observed nonlinear dependence of sequence variability on flexibility. Finally, when mutational stress is controlled for, there is very little remaining correlation between sequence variability and dynamical flexibility.ConclusionsWe developed a mechanistic Stress Model of evolution according to which the rate of evolution of a site is predicted to depend linearly on the local mutational stress of the active conformation. Such local stress is proportional to LPD, so that this model explains the relationship between LPD and evolutionary rate. Moreover, the model also accounts for the nonlinear dependence between evolutionary rate and dynamical flexibility.

FLEXc: Protein Flexibility Prediction Using Context-Based Statistics, Predicted Structural Features, and Sequence Information

Predicting Protein Flexibility with AlphaFold

Assessment of Four Theoretical Approaches to Predict Protein Flexibility in the Crystal Phase and Solution

Protein flexibility upon ligand binding: Docking predictions and statistical analysis

Protein flexibility prediction by an all-atom mean-field statistical theory

Accurate Prediction of Protein Structural Flexibility by Deep Learning Integrating Intricate Atomic Structures and Cryo-EM Density Information

Decoding Protein Dynamics: ProFlex as a Linguistic Bridge in Normal Mode Analysis

Exploring protein functions from structural flexibility using CABS‐flex modeling

Buried and accessible surface area control intrinsic protein flexibility

FlexVDW: A machine learning approach to account for protein flexibility in ligand docking

Recent Developments in Data-Assisted Modeling of Flexible Proteins

Fast and Anisotropic Flexibility-Rigidity Index

Flexibility of $Α$-Helices: Results of a Statistical Analysis of Database Protein Structures

Advanced atom-level representations for protein flexibility prediction utilizing graph neural networks

3DFlex: determining structure and motion of flexible proteins from cryo-EM

Predicting the Energetics of Conformational Fluctuations in Proteins from Sequence: A Strategy for Profiling the Proteome

Multiscale differential geometry learning for protein flexibility analysis

A mechanistic stress model of protein evolution accounts for site-specific evolutionary rates and their relationship with packing density and flexibility

RNAfcg: RNA Flexibility Prediction Based on Topological Centrality and Global Features

A Systematic Analysis of the Effect of Small-Molecule Binding on Protein Flexibility of the Ligand-Binding Sites

How to describe protein motion without amino acid sequence and atomic coordinates