Abstract:We apply two approximate solutions of the quantum-classical Liouville equation (QCLE) in the mapping representation to the simulation of the laser-induced response of a quantum subsystem coupled to a classical environment. These solutions, known as the Poisson Bracket Mapping Equation (PBME) and the Forward-Backward (FB) trajectory solutions, involve simple algorithms in which the dynamics of both the quantum and classical degrees of freedom are described in terms of continuous variables, as opposed to standard surface-hopping solutions in which the classical degrees of freedom hop between potential energy surfaces dictated by the discrete adiabatic state of the quantum subsystem. The validity of these QCLE-based solutions is tested on a non-trivial electron transfer model involving more than two quantum states, a time-dependent Hamiltonian, strong subsystem-bath coupling, and an initial energy shift between the donor and acceptor states that depends on the strength of the subsystem-bath coupling. In particular, we calculate the time-dependent population of the photoexcited donor state in response to an ultrafast, on-resonance pump pulse in a three-state model of an electron transfer complex that is coupled asymmetrically to a bath of harmonic oscillators through the optically dark acceptor state. Within this approach, the three-state electron transfer complex is treated quantum mechanically, while the bath oscillators are treated classically. When compared to the more accurate QCLE-based surface-hopping solution and to the numerically exact quantum results, we find that the PBME solution is not capable of qualitatively capturing the population dynamics, whereas the FB solution is. However, when the subsystem-bath coupling is decreased (which also decreases the initial energy shift between the donor and acceptor states) or the initial shift is removed altogether, both the PBME and FB results agree better with the QCLE-based surface-hopping results. These findings highlight the challenges posed by various conditions such as a time-dependent external field, the strength of the subsystem-bath coupling, and the degree of asymmetry on the accuracy of the PBME and FB algorithms. (C) 2013 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4799272]

Classical and nonclassical effects in surface hopping methodology for simulating coupled electronic-nuclear dynamics

Surface Hopping without Momentum Jumps: A Quantum-Trajectory-Based Approach to Nonadiabatic Dynamics

A generalized surface hopping method

Analysis of the Trajectory Surface Hopping Method from the Markov State Model Perspective

Recent Progress in Surface Hopping: 2011–2015

Quantum Quality with Classical Cost: Ab Initio Nonadiabatic Dynamics Simulations Using the Mapping Approach to Surface Hopping

Surface hopping from the perspective of quantum-classical Liouville dynamics

Efficient and accurate surface hopping for long time nonadiabatic quantum dynamics

Global Flux Surface Hopping Approach for Mixed Quantum-Classical Dynamics.

Nonadiabatic dynamics with quantum nuclei: simulating charge transfer with ring polymer surface hopping

Surface hopping methods for nonadiabatic dynamics in extended systems

A semiclassical non-adiabatic phase-space approach to molecular translations and rotations: A new picture of surface hopping and electronic inertial effects

Quantum Dynamics from Classical Trajectories

A Mixed Quantum-Classical Liouville Study Of The Population Dynamics In A Model Photo-Induced Condensed Phase Electron Transfer Reaction

Coupled Trajectory Surface Hopping with Sign Consistency

Quantum-Classical Nonadiabatic Dynamics: Coupled- vs Independent-Trajectory Methods

A general method to describe intersystem crossing dynamics in trajectory surface hopping

Quantum-Classical Non-Adiabatic Dynamics: Coupled- vs. Independent-Trajectory Methods

A First Principles Derivation of Energy Conserving Momentum Jumps in Surface Hopping Simulations

Mixed Quantum-Classical Equilibrium In Global Flux Surface Hopping