The Role of Retinal Dopamine in C57BL/6 Mouse Refractive Development As Revealed by Intravitreal Administration of 6-Hydroxydopamine.

Xiao-Hua Wu,Kang-Wei Qian,Guo-Zhong Xu,Yun-Yun Li,Yuan-Yuan Ma,Furong Huang,Yan-Qing Wang,Xiangtian Zhou,Jia Qu,Xiong-Li Yang,Yong-Mei Zhong,Shi-Jun Weng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-19543
2016-01-01
Abstract:PurposeAlthough retinal dopamine (DA) has been long implicated in myopia development, current studies demonstrate that retinal DA levels are unaltered in C57BL/6 mice with form-deprivation myopia. This work was undertaken to explore whether and how refractive development is perturbed in this mouse strain when retinal DA levels are reduced by 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) administration.MethodsOn two successive days, 6-OHDA was injected into the vitreous of P18 mice. Retinal DA levels were measured by HPLC and TH levels analyzed by quantitative Western blotting. To choose appropriate 6-OHDA doses that significantly reduce retinal DA levels, but cause minimal disturbance of overall retinal physiology, ERG analysis was performed. Refractive errors were measured using a photorefractor, and ocular biometry performed with optical coherence tomography and photokeratometry.ResultsAdministration of 6-OHDA of 6.25 μg and 12.5 μg significantly reduced retinal levels of DA and TH, but without affecting ERG a- and b-wave amplitudes. With normal visual experience, 6-OHDA induced myopic refractive shifts in a dose-dependent fashion. Form deprivation induced further myopic shifts in 6-OHDA-injected eyes, but did not cause further decline in retinal DA. Furthermore, 6-OHDA administration resulted in a shorter axial length and a steeper cornea, whereas form deprivation led to a longer axial length, without changing the corneal radius of curvature.ConclusionsReducing retinal DA levels led to myopic refractive shifts in C57BL/6 mice, which mainly resulted from a steeper cornea. In addition to the DA-independent mechanism for form-deprivation myopia, there is a DA-dependent mechanism in parallel that underlies myopic refractive shifts under normal laboratory conditions in this mouse strain.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?