[Efficacy of Additional Two Cycles of Rituximab Administration for Patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in First Remission].

H J Zhong,P,W L Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2016.09.006
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To analyze the efficacy of additional two cycles of rituximab administration for Chinese patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in first complete remission (CR) after six cycles of standard 21-day rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP21). Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed in 351 patients with DLBCL diagnosed from March 2003 to March 2012. International Prognosis Index (IPI), Revised (R)-IPI and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-IPI were calculated for each patient. Patients were divided into GCB and non-GCB subtype according to Han's Classification. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: 282 (80.3%) patients achieved CR and 132 (46.8%) of 282 cases received additional two rituximab therapy. The other 150 (53.2%) patients entered into observation on the intention of the patients. No significant difference was observed in baseline characteristics between the two groups. 3-year estimated PFS for additional rituximab group and observation group were 80.0% and 78.1% (P=0.334), while 3-year estimated OS were 89.7% vs. 86.1% (P=0.452). By subgroup analysis, prolonged PFS were observed in R-IPI low-risk and NCCN-IPI low-risk patients after additional two rituximab cycles. Conclusion: For patients with DLBCL in first remission after standard six cycles of R-CHOP21 regimen, additional two cycles of rituximab maintenance did not significantly improve the general prognosis, but low-risk subgroups of R-IPI and NCCN-IPI could benefit from this regimen.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?