Abstract:The Other-Race Effect (ORE) is the robust and well-established finding that people are generally poorer at facial recognition of individuals of another race than of their own race. Over the past four decades, much research has focused on the ORE because understanding this phenomenon is expected to elucidate fundamental face processing mechanisms and the influence of experience on such mechanisms. Several recent studies of the ORE in which the eye-movements of participants viewing own- and other-race faces were tracked have, however, reported highly conflicting results regarding the presence or absence of differential patterns of eye-movements to own- versus other-race faces. This discrepancy, of course, leads to conflicting theoretical interpretations of the perceptual basis for the ORE. Here we investigate fixation patterns to own- versus other-race (African and Chinese) faces for Caucasian participants using different analysis methods. While we detect statistically significant, though subtle, differences in fixation pattern using an Area of Interest (AOI) approach, we fail to detect significant differences when applying a spatial density map approach. Though there were no significant differences in the spatial density maps, the qualitative patterns matched the results from the AOI analyses reflecting how, in certain contexts, Area of Interest (AOI) analyses can be more sensitive in detecting the differential fixation patterns than spatial density analyses, due to spatial pooling of data with AOIs. AOI analyses, however, also come with the limitation of requiring a priori specification. These findings provide evidence that the conflicting reports in the prior literature may be at least partially accounted for by the differences in the statistical sensitivity associated with the different analysis methods employed across studies. Overall, our results suggest that detection of differences in eye-movement patterns can be analysis-dependent and rests on the assumptions inherent in the given analysis.

Development of Effective Connectivity During Own- and Other-Race Face Processing: A Granger Causality Analysis

Different Brain Activations Between Own- and Other-Race Face Categorization: an Fmri Study Using Group Independent Component Analysis

The Fusiform Face Area Plays a Greater Role in Holistic Processing for Own-Race Faces Than Other-Race Faces

Typical And Atypical Development Of Functional Connectivity In The Face Network

The Neural Correlates of Own- and Other-Race Face Recognition and Categorization: A Fmri Study

The Other Face of the Other-Race Effect: an Fmri Investigation of the Other-Race Face Categorization Advantage.

The Role of Configural Processing in Face Classification by Race: an ERP Study.

Neural Trade-Offs Between Recognizing and Categorizing Own- and Other-Race Faces.

A Novel Extended Granger Causal Model Approach Demonstrates Brain Hemispheric Differences During Face Recognition Learning.

The Neural Basis of Contextual Influences on Face Categorization.

Event-related potential correlates of implicit processing of own- and other-race faces in children

Homogenization of Face Neural Representation During Development

Brain Network Reorganization During Visual Search Task Revealed by a Network Analysis of Fixation-Related Potential.

Differences in Looking at Own- and Other-Race Faces Are Subtle and Analysis-Dependent: An Account of Discrepant Reports

Revealing the neural representations underlying other-race face perception

Shape, color and the other-race effect in the infant brain

Own-Race Faces Capture Attention Faster Than Other-Race Faces: Evidence from Response Time and the N2pc

Covariation in the recognition of own-race and other-race faces argues against the role of group bias in the other race effect

The other-race effect and holistic processing across racial groups

Developmental Reorganization of the Core and Extended Face Networks Revealed by Global Functional Connectivity

Distinct Patterns of Neural Response to Faces from Different Races in Humans and Deep Networks